Travel2 mins ago
They Are All In This Together---They Just Can Not Help It Can They.
Infosy..A firm founded by Richi Sunak's father in law is now under investigation in a multimillion pound dispute with HMRC..
Sunaks wife holds a stake in this Co also. They are disputing a tax bill of £20m.....Mrs Sunak shares in this Company is a mere £700m.
......"Only the poor pay tax " ...It's stopped out of their wages...
.........One Law for the rich Eh.
Sunaks wife holds a stake in this Co also. They are disputing a tax bill of £20m.....Mrs Sunak shares in this Company is a mere £700m.
......"Only the poor pay tax " ...It's stopped out of their wages...
.........One Law for the rich Eh.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by gulliver1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.From The Guardian:
//A spokesperson for Infosys told the Guardian: “Infosys provides details of certain ongoing disputes with various regulatory authorities, including this specific tax matter with HMRC. The company has filed an appeal against a tax assessment in the UK and has obtained a stay on the payment of the tax demand from HMRC.”
Narayana Murthy is no longer involved in the direct management of Infosys, after resigning from a senior role in 2014. Akshata Murty is also not involved in running the company//
So what is the problem? Company doesnt like the tax assessment and appeals - so what happens every hour of the day.
//A spokesperson for Infosys told the Guardian: “Infosys provides details of certain ongoing disputes with various regulatory authorities, including this specific tax matter with HMRC. The company has filed an appeal against a tax assessment in the UK and has obtained a stay on the payment of the tax demand from HMRC.”
Narayana Murthy is no longer involved in the direct management of Infosys, after resigning from a senior role in 2014. Akshata Murty is also not involved in running the company//
So what is the problem? Company doesnt like the tax assessment and appeals - so what happens every hour of the day.
This Tax dispute involving Sunaks FIL which has nothing to do with Sunak according to YMB ,comes at a sensitive time for the PM Who only last week had to sack Zahawi for tax irregularities. Also his own wife has been under scrutiny for claiming non- dom status to lessen her tax bill.. nothing to do with PM Sunack of course.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
I will ask you again, are you responsible or your father in laws actions?
I w ill respond more than waaarnce
yes if he has left you anything ( inheritance ( tax dispute)
yes if you were there when he DID it ! ( accomplice etc)
yes if you incited him
yes if you drove him there to 'DO' it
gormless q with four gormlesser answers
normal day on Ab then
I w ill respond more than waaarnce
yes if he has left you anything ( inheritance ( tax dispute)
yes if you were there when he DID it ! ( accomplice etc)
yes if you incited him
yes if you drove him there to 'DO' it
gormless q with four gormlesser answers
normal day on Ab then
If one disputes something then it has to be looked at .
yes disputed facts merit an inquiry/further investigation
zahawi - very little was disputed ( apparently), so it was a matter of a decision
Raab - the poor little bullied mandarins have made it clear they will only testify if anonymised ( which goes against one of the principles of english law) - AND the facts are disputed
yes disputed facts merit an inquiry/further investigation
zahawi - very little was disputed ( apparently), so it was a matter of a decision
Raab - the poor little bullied mandarins have made it clear they will only testify if anonymised ( which goes against one of the principles of english law) - AND the facts are disputed
wives are v difficult
https:/ /public ations. parliam ent.uk/ pa/ld19 9899/ld judgmt/ jd99011 5/pino0 1.htm - In re Pincochet no 2 (*).
Lord Snooty LJ ( Hoffman) was giving a judgement concerning Pinochet on whether he could be indicted whilst he was in London for medical treatment
and it came lately ( after his lordships judgement) that his wife was working for Amnesty International - and it was decided that this was a fatal conflict
Reeshi is only PM - Ld Hoffman - The Hoff took it badly
(*)screams of foo what dat den from all sides
https:/
Lord Snooty LJ ( Hoffman) was giving a judgement concerning Pinochet on whether he could be indicted whilst he was in London for medical treatment
and it came lately ( after his lordships judgement) that his wife was working for Amnesty International - and it was decided that this was a fatal conflict
Reeshi is only PM - Ld Hoffman - The Hoff took it badly
(*)screams of foo what dat den from all sides