News0 min ago
Hancock And Oakeshott. What Do You Think?
Errrrr. That's it, my question that is.
Answers
....or the SNP nationalist separatists either Atheist.Well done for puting this up.
21:16 Wed 01st Mar 2023
Just listening to the smarmy Fraser Nelson droning on about this.
Sounds like the anti-restriction lobby putting the boot in.
Boring as hell all this now. I’m fed up with both sides in this argument. Politics and science clashing and everyone largely trying to do their best.
Let sensible neutral people do the review.
Sounds like the anti-restriction lobby putting the boot in.
Boring as hell all this now. I’m fed up with both sides in this argument. Politics and science clashing and everyone largely trying to do their best.
Let sensible neutral people do the review.
We must assume Oakeshott‘s motive is money.
She was commissioned the write Hancocks biography, and received a vast trove of information.
She did her contracted work, and wrote a ‘Hancock saves the Country’ narrative tome.
She obviously found Hancock odious and repulsive and set about doing him damage. She leaked his messages. He is hung by his own words.
Let’s not forget that 35,000 people quickly died in Care Homes - vastly higher than in our European neighbours.
Hancock must have been incredibly dim to voluntarily hand over this data.
She was commissioned the write Hancocks biography, and received a vast trove of information.
She did her contracted work, and wrote a ‘Hancock saves the Country’ narrative tome.
She obviously found Hancock odious and repulsive and set about doing him damage. She leaked his messages. He is hung by his own words.
Let’s not forget that 35,000 people quickly died in Care Homes - vastly higher than in our European neighbours.
Hancock must have been incredibly dim to voluntarily hand over this data.
Even his response is pathetic.
He does not deny he received advice and chose to ignore it. But he claims the messages have been ‘doctored’, whatever that means.
No attempt to explain how the ‘doctored’ messages disprove the allegation.
https:/
He does not deny he received advice and chose to ignore it. But he claims the messages have been ‘doctored’, whatever that means.
No attempt to explain how the ‘doctored’ messages disprove the allegation.
https:/
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.