Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
Clarkson Gutted. Poor Man Discovers He's Not Getting What He Deserves?
https:/
I haven't read all this guff, but he seems to be a huge figure of sympathy because of his failure to make his farm work out.
I haven't read all this guff, but he seems to be a huge figure of sympathy because of his failure to make his farm work out.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Atheist. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
"i didnt realise there was going to be a season 3 - i thought that given his persona non grata status following his GOT comments there wouldnt be"
i was referring to his recent faux pas when he said that duchess of sussex should be pelted with poo while being paraded naked in the street or some such thing
i was referring to his recent faux pas when he said that duchess of sussex should be pelted with poo while being paraded naked in the street or some such thing
"Naomi; You'll defend Clarkson's disgusting abuse?"
You're being ridiculous.
It wasn't "disgusting abuse", it was humorous hyperbole, which is JC's style, and always has been. Do you think he really wanted to throw excrement at Markle?
I have no doubt had, say, Toynbee said something similar you wouldn't be as outraged; you simply don't like Clarkson, which is fair enough, but it wasn't "disgusting abuse", far from it.
Re: Clarkson's farm, the villagers are demonstrating nimbysim, and the local council are being vindictive and pernicious. In one of the shows, where Clarkson was denied building a farm track on his land, he asked Charlie if he had ever heard of such a thing, and the answer was (paraphrasing) "No, they've denied YOU Jeremy", so it's clearly personal.
The lawyer acting on behalf of the villagers (the same lawyer that appeared in one of the shows and was advising JC), put forward an argument, with a straight face presumably, that because of the price of the pats of butter being sold in the farm shop, they were souvenirs!
You're being ridiculous.
It wasn't "disgusting abuse", it was humorous hyperbole, which is JC's style, and always has been. Do you think he really wanted to throw excrement at Markle?
I have no doubt had, say, Toynbee said something similar you wouldn't be as outraged; you simply don't like Clarkson, which is fair enough, but it wasn't "disgusting abuse", far from it.
Re: Clarkson's farm, the villagers are demonstrating nimbysim, and the local council are being vindictive and pernicious. In one of the shows, where Clarkson was denied building a farm track on his land, he asked Charlie if he had ever heard of such a thing, and the answer was (paraphrasing) "No, they've denied YOU Jeremy", so it's clearly personal.
The lawyer acting on behalf of the villagers (the same lawyer that appeared in one of the shows and was advising JC), put forward an argument, with a straight face presumably, that because of the price of the pats of butter being sold in the farm shop, they were souvenirs!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.