Donate SIGN UP

Lip-Reading

Avatar Image
Khandro | 07:16 Mon 08th May 2023 | News
48 Answers
Employing 'lip-readers' & reporting what they think has been said in the press seems to be in vogue at the moment. Is this not an intrusion of privacy on a par with phone-hacking? in fact is this not worse, because with a voice recording you have the evidence of what was said, with lip-reading you may have only what they think was said & it is impossible to corroborate?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 48rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
There are so many experts about, lip reading and body language experts.
Lip readers offer a service to the hearing impaired.
And you have an issue with that?
The people Khandro is talking about are not doing it for the benefit of the hearing impaired ... but you knew that, 1ozzy.

Yes, I do think it's intrusive.
I think what Khandro is complaining about, quite rightly I think, is that the press are hiring lip-readers to find out what people were saying in private to each other; it's on a par with phone-tapping. They were publishing what (they thought) the king said to the queen and is son at the coronation.
//but you knew that, 1ozzy.
//
It's so good to know that other people know me better than I know myself Naomi.
Thank very much for your valued input.
Much appreciated,,
You're most welcome.
I agree that is intrusive, it is wrong. Must be horrible to need to be aware that you are being so closely scrutinised
Horrible, and exceedingly comfortable at the same time.
These lip reading "experts", having deciding what they think has been said, then repeat it, so it's not for the benefit of the deaf. Yes, total intrusion.
At most sports games, is why players cover their mouths.
I've just been reading snatches of what was said between Harry and either Beatrice or Eugenie's husband in the abbey. Not the whole conversation, just enough to encourage people to make their own ideas of what it was about. I think it's dreadful that the royals can't move or speak at the moment without some 'expert' spouting.
Question Author
The educated English upper classes usually spoke to one another on private matters in French when in front of servants & children.

I don't know which languages Queen Camilla speaks (probably French) but King Charles is said to speak French and German - even some Welsh, I believe.

It's a sorry state of affairs, but if this odious practice isn't outlawed perhaps that's what he should do in future.

How can outlawing lip reading possibly be policed? Reporting what's said could be outlawed, but no one can stop people lip reading.
Loose lip readers sink woose crap readers.
// Reporting what's said could be outlawed ... //

I don't think it could be -- the conversation may well be intended to be private, but if it's happening in public view then it can hardly be made illegal to report what was said, or at the very least to speculate.

I don't wish to defend the practice from a moral viewpoint, but it's presumably not that dissimilar to a "hot mic" situation, and I don't think I'd agree with Khandro's comparison to phone-hacking.
Question Author
naomi// How can outlawing lip reading possibly be policed?//

It can't & isn't the problem (I'm quite good at it myself) but the press printing what their hired lip-reader thinks was said should be outlawed. It is really an outrageous invasion of privacy.
If it's happening in a public place, the people concerned can't have any expectation of privacy. The onus is on them to make sure what they're saying remains private.

If it's not public, e.g they're in a private residence and someone's spying on them with binoculars, it's an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
It could be a useful asset used lawfully for crime/terrorist prevention. If the King really said what was reported by the lip reader I would be a miffed if I had organised that great ceremonial pageant. I bet he wasn’t up at 0300 for the last several weeks getting the timing right at rehearsals!!
Question Author
tomus; The King & Queen were alone in a private carriage in the covered, windowed entrance to Buckingham Palace.

Do you not think it is fair to assume that what you say to each other will not be broadcast in national newspapers?
Question Author
retro; //It could be a useful asset used lawfully for crime/terrorist prevention.//

What a so-called 'lip-reader' thinks he/she saw is impossible to corroborate, & would never stand up in a court of law.

1 to 20 of 48rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Lip-Reading

Answer Question >>