ChatterBank6 mins ago
Trump, The Best Us President Since Ronald Reagan
Forget the Establishment commentariat view that Trump is ‘crazy’, or a ‘threat to democracy’.
Just consider Trump’s record.
During his first term, the Beijing-Moscow-Tehran-Pyongyang axis, and its terrorist clients, were on their very best behaviour.
The US border was secure against massive waves of crime-gang-controlled unverified illegal immigration that Biden has unconstitutionally imposed on the US. (A Stuart King was beheaded for less.)
Beijing was forced to abandon its breaches of trade law and massive theft of intellectual property.
In the face of climate catastrophism ideology that only enriches Beijing, Trump was the first global leader with the courage not only to declare that the climate emperor has no clothes, he withdrew the US from the Paris Accords.
In addition, not only did Trump stand out as a President who started no new wars, he destroyed ISIS, and brought peace to the Middle East through the Abraham Accords between Israel and Muslim states.
The Spectator, Australia
Comments ?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The US border was secure against crime-controlled illegal immigration that Biden has unconstitutionally imposed on the US. (A Stuart King was beheaded for less.)
er is a non sequitur of AB proportions. Note I have shortened the quote in case the average AB reader wilts half way froo.
I know of no instance where James I encouraged immigration. After the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes which WAS by royal edict ( Louis XIV that is!) - yakkety yakety
ichi //Nikki Haley on the other hand, whose star is rising ... //
Really? I think not;
The former president had the support of 49% of Republicans in a nationwide poll conducted by Reuters and market research company, Ipsos, on Wednesday, far ahead of Ms Haley in second place at 12% and Mr DeSantis at 11%.
The fact is that Donald Trump could walk on water, cure cancer & give everyone a thousand dollars, & to the myopic lefties on here he would still be a baddie 😄
Eat your hearts out, The Donald is heading for the White House.
// The fact is that Donald Trump could walk on water, cure cancer & give everyone a thousand dollars, & to the myopic lefties on here he would still be a baddie 😄//
On the other hand, he could poison the water, invent a new cancer and steal a thousand bucks from everyone, and the sycophantic fanboys would still think he's one of the good guys.
//the myopic lefties on here he would still be a baddie//
This is not a left/right political issue.
You do not need to be a 'leftie' to be opposed to Trump. You just need a few functioning brain cells, the ability to think objectively, and to care about the continuation of democracy in the US. I would personally happily see any of the other Republican candidates beat Biden, as obnoxious as alot of them are.
I suggest you take a look at what the stable genius said about his attitude towards NATO and Europe when he was in office. It's in various news reports today. You may need to venture outside your echo chamber to find them though.
What about the Biden sycophants, mozz?
He's truly awful, yet gets a pass from the msm. Imagine Trump talking about a primary school kid like this
''I er, I love those barrettes in your hair man. I'll tell you what look at her she looks like she's 19 years old sitting there in er urgh like a little lady with her legs crossed''
What? What's the thought process there?
And as everyone knows but most ignore, there's a constant supply of the creepy, weird behaviour from him.
A true nepotist too. His drug addled son has got super rich trading and threatening in daddy's name. (I wonder if they divvy it up?)
tomus //This is not a left/right political issue//
Well that's news to the Americans, ha-ha.
//I suggest you take a look at what the stable genius said about his attitude towards NATO and Europe when he was in office.//
I suggest you do too; what he said was some European members including Germany were not paying their full contributions and the US was having to always making up the shortfall.
Quite understandable, methinks.
Trump of/to the UN has denounced “globalism” and illegal immigration and promotes patriotism as a cure for [many of] the world’s ills.
Correct or not ? & said further;
“The free world must embrace its national foundations. It must not attempt to erase them, or replace them,” Trump said. “The true good of the nation, can only be pursued by those who love it, by citizens who are rooted in its history, who are nourished by its culture, committed to its values, attached to his people.”
Correct or not?
In 2020 Trump allegedly told van der Leyden: "NATO is dead. We'll never come to your aid if Europe is attacked"
yeah I read that - in direct opposition to Gen Warbucks in the sixties who said: " dont you dummies realise that by having 'murican forces in Europe it means our next war is fought in Europe and not 'murica"
problems with having a long memory - you hear a thing in one decade and then the direct opposite two decades later
ichi // In 2020 Trump allegedly told van der Leyden: "NATO is dead. We'll never come to your aid if Europe is attacked"//
Fake news! & Trump does not speak for NATO. I also defy you to find anything more than that is something allegedly (your word) overheard in a private conversation & not to said to Uvd Leyen or the EU.
I think your fears are for the future of Ukraine, I understand that, but it is a very large & complicated subject.
I realise it is all talk khandro: every time he opens his mouth on the subject something different comes out. But it's not what you want to hear from a supposed ally. It's good to keep your enemies guessing but surely not your friends also 😂😂😂.
(Ukraine is actually comparatively straightforward. Don't listen to ruzzian propagandists who'd have you believe otherwise: fortunately while America sleeps Europe awakes)
ichi. If Trump brought the war to a close with an end to the killing of young (and older) soldiers and civilian men women and children withe the destuction of homes and infrastructure at the cost of a small amount of territory in the East plus Crimea. Would you accept that, or prefer to see the bloody war continue indefinitely?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.