Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 15 of 15rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

I think those talks will be very much on the back burner.

Or at the very least the sideburner lol. (Has anyone told him ...)

// Mr Milei's first bilateral meeting with the UK - a private session with Foreign Secretary Lord Cameron. //

What do you imagine Cameron talked about at that meeting - the cost of corned beef ?

Call me Lord Dave by the look of it.

Wouldnt surprise me, slippery liberal that he is.

The answer is in your link,  'Speaking shortly after his meeting with Lord Cameron, he said: "We talked about the Falklands and it is something for future diplomatic negotiations."'

//I think those talks will be very much on the back burner.//

 

I doubt anyone has really switched the cooker on yet.

Question Author

Yeah he may have been talking to Dave but I can't imagine he'd have got any sort of "discussion" out of him regarding the Falklands.

"

'A UK official said: "On the Falkland Islands, the foreign secretary and president Milei said they would agree to disagree, and do so politely."'

There was some sort of discussion but not one that was constructive. 

It should just have gone

Milei, 'Hi Dave, about the Falklands'

Dave, 'F off'

//Milei, 'Hi Dave, about the Falklands'

Dave, 'F off'//

It would have been something like that. Enough for him to say he had a discussion.

He made a daft promise: he used a meeting with Cameron to give the impression there was the remotest chance in hell of it being fulfilled. All he actually promised it would appear was that "discussions would occur in the future": he can't really go wrong with that in a sense. He just needs a can, a road and a pair of sturdy toecaps.

If Dave ain't making money out of it, ..he won't want to know.

Question Author

Maybe he's been having a word with Rodders on the off chance he gets into no 10. Labour would probably have just given them up in 1982. Yes I know Callagas said he'd have done the same thing but I'm talking about duffle coat who was LOTO in 1982.

Las malvinas son argentinas!

-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --

1 to 15 of 15rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Who's This Bloke Been Talking To Then?

Answer Question >>