ChatterBank4 mins ago
Sunak -V- Starmer Tv Debate
ITV tonight
Your thoughts?
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Starmer was out of his depth - embarassingly so. On the question of stopping the boats, Sunak promised flights to Rwanda will go in July. Why not now, Mr Sunak? If you're going to do it, show us you're going to do it. Dangling the carrot is tantamount to taking the electorate for fools.
Neither man offers anything I can take seriously.
Oh, I don't know about a 'total' waste of time, NJ. I think it was enlightening in its way. I can't remember exactly how the question was phrased but when the pair were asked if they'd resort to private health care for a family member who needed urgent treatment amd couldn't get it on the NHS, Sunak said 'yes' - and Starmer said 'no'. I simply do not believe him.
Mr Starmer is either a liar or completely mad.
The problem is, he is unlikely ever to face such a dilemma. Once his relative's local NHS Trust gets to know who they are related to, strings will be pulled and they will be accelerated to the top of the list. Then Mr Starmer will proudly bleat that the NHS is "the envy of the world."
Well it isn't. It's a complete and utter shambles and needs abolishing forthwith. Mrs NJ had a telephone appointment with a consultant this morning. The call never came. She tried to contact the consultant's secretary but "she doesn't work on Wednesdays." The alternative secretary in the same team to whom she was directed also has Wednesdays off. She managed to get hold of the consultant's team leader's office to be told "I don't know why you're ringing this number. What do you expect me to do? It will have to wait until tomorrow."
Well it won't actually. For the second time this year, Mrs NJ sets off down the private medicine path - which Mr Starmer would do if he was in the same position.
Her consultant's secretary will get an irate call tomorrow from one of other of us which will no doubt "upset her" greatly as it did the last time she suffered a similar episode of ineptitude. Oh dear. How sad. Never mind.
Meanwhile people continue to believe the NHS is the envy of the world - poor demented darlings.
Didn't watch the debate because they are a complete waste of time, and anybody who gets swayed by them probably shouldn't have a vote in the first place.
But I did hear the NHS/Private choice answer to the question on the radio this morning, and I also believe SKS lied.
Does he seriously expect the public to believe that if a close family member was in debilitating pain, that somebody worth millions wouldn't pay privately. He's a liar.
Let's take knee problems (and I'm using this example for personal reasons), this can be incredibly painful and can make you immobile. I had to go under the knife but fortunately I'm insured so it was done quickly. An uninsured friend of mine waited months to see a consultant and still doesn't have a date for surgery. And he seriously expects us to believe if he was in my friends position he'd wait months to have it sorted? If people do believe this, then their naivety is off the chart.
I have sympathy with all sides regarding the NHS. It cannot be fixed with the tinkerings that they propose and bicker about. It needs to be treated like a war and have cross party effort to fix it rather than using it for their political points. The NHS is in desparate need and throwing money at it will not help, it needs root and branch reform, a reboot if you like, start again. Either side should put aside their bickering and spinning and work together. It's one of the few things that Labour have ever done that was a very good thing for the country and the concept is still very good. It now needs more than one parliament to sort it out.