ChatterBank10 mins ago
Assange - What A Farce!
https:/
I feel as though the UK has been suckered into this long running saga only to have a farcical outcome. "Oh well, just let him go."
Why did we even bother holding him at all? Defies belief.
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by davebro3. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.We ended up involved because we had little choice due to agreements. The outcome will have been negotiated between his brief and the USA so again we were just stuck in the middle.
I think both TTT and Douglas have valid points, but who knows maybe he will just ride off into the sunset in the outback never to be seen again.
The Americans were always going to seek a face-saving solution to this debacle
o god who are the septics for chrissakes? - "foo da septics fing fong daddle, they do!"
Mrs Assange was good on R4 - the fluffy pressenter completely at sea over this. The rape charge has been dropped and so under a treaty of extradition he was going to go to America - chop ! chop!
There were appeals over whether there wd be a fair trial in the Land of the Free - as Trump had given an opinion - which might influence a judge considering he had appointed them all.
THEN it worked out ( as Mrs Assange averred, and Fluffy went 'errrrk!') The high court in London ( yes london reader) was gonna hear evidence on whether a first amendment defence ( yes in the land of the free reader) wd get up and run.
and they scrambled for a negotiated solution
( giving foo to Trumps allegation/insistence tht the DoJ in America is heavily politicised)
.the septics don't forgive and forget, - - foo danga foo danga!
he might justly say, as Galilei did: and yet it does move.
eppur si muove - just to bring a bit of old forrin into the discussion. - I suppose the Latin may be " ita movet, miser galile!" - "miser" cos he gonna fry if he doan say what Popey at the time say.
Well if you poke the Bear dont be surprised when it bites back.
What he should have done is redact names from the list so not putting peoples lives in danger(particualry in Afghanistan) and the headed straight for a friendly country, perhaps bunk up with Snowdon.
But no, his ego got the better of him and we are where we are.
Even the journos who nothing about it are saying it shows the american justice system (*) is heavily politicised - which is not to the public's advantage.
R4 tonight. The freedom of speech defence only works for certain charges, and never for espionage
and everyone suddenly realised that
so they settled - - - sort of logic you get on AB
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.