Donate SIGN UP

Reform Have Handed No 10 To Labour.....

Avatar Image
ToraToraTora | 09:02 Fri 05th Jul 2024 | News
49 Answers

3/4 of the Lab gains from Con were down to reform. The latest just in was Poole, Labour by 18 votes, over 7000 reform voters elected Labour. This has happened in 3/4 of the Labour gains.

"Vote reform - get Labour" - it seems was bang on.

Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 49rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

ttt less than a week ago the reform party had nothing,now 4 mp's  are through the westminster door,so i'd call that a win

5 MPs

Reform were second in 98 constituencies. Every seat that Reform won needed over 1million votes, whilst Labour only needed 100,000 votes per seat won. This is a 10/1 disparity in our voting system and is further evidence that the historic rigged 2 party system was never designed to be to the advantage of the ordinary voter, or to pay heed to the wishes of the man in the street voter. Reform is needed more than ever!

https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/BB1ptweQ.img?w=590&h=393&m=6

  

This election, as Farage said it would be, was largely about immigration  & the failure of the Tories to tackle it.

Stand by now & watch how Labour will, if it is possible, do even worse.

 

TOGO, there was a referendum in 2011 asking if an alternative vote system should be introduced in future general elections.

If the "yes" side had won, a new system would have had to be introduced. The "no" side won by almost 2:1 so do you think a new referendum would produce a different outcome?

So nothing at all to do with the shambles in Government over the last 5 years then 😀

TTT will  be hailing The Nige was the best Prime Minister we never had.

It would be much better if TTT voted as a block vote instead of all those illiterate proles...

i suspect this is exactly why labour pulled their candidate out of clacton in the last few weeks... they wantef farage to win because they want reform to split the right-wing vote again in the next election 

very similar to labour and the SDP in the 1980s which kept the tories in 

a good example of the dirty tricks that our stupid voting system rewards. i truly hope that right wing voters come around to seeing the folly of it now that the shoe is on the other foot

//The "no" side won by almost 2:1 so do you think a new referendum would produce a different outcome?//

It might if the proposed new system was better & better explained & understood and the inequity of the present FPTP "fix up" highlighted. Needs a good campaigner to take up the reins - I wonder who we could get🙄

Boo Hoo TTT.

Continue to cry into your porridge every morning 😪

Alas, the plebs have spoken 😏

BBC Headline:

"After the impotence of opposition, Keir Starmer prepares to wield power"

Confirmation (if it were needed) that we live in an autocracy!

//

Nigel Farage has launched a campaign against the first-past-the-post electoral system, saying his party would have won 100 seats under proportional representation.

The Reform UK leader and newly-elected MP for Clacton called the current voting system “outdated” and said he would “campaign with anyone and everyone” to change it as his party won its fifth and final seat on Friday evening. //

It must feel good in the UK to wake up with the sun shining and know there is a new future awaiting you, with day one of a safe secure Labour Govt. Welcome to the sunny uplands that lie ahead for you. And as Thatcher once said it's time to  .....Rejoice....... Rejoice.

For all AB Lefties:

The light you imagine you see at the end of the tunnel is, I fear, the proverbial oncoming train.

Sunak a banker, saw the world through the prism of finance & Starmer a lawyer, sees the world through law, and will set about changing your life through a plenitude of crackpot legislation.

e.g. 'Islamaphobia' enshrined in law, scrapping Rwanda, zero carbon, re-joining the EU, remaining firmly in the ECHR & much more.

Also b.t.w. look at the stats; the Labour "Landslide", is an illusion and doesn't reflect the true feeling of the country at all.

  

Khandro 08.44 "The Labour Landslide is an illusion" Have you been out drinking with TTT ?  He reckons the Tories won the election on his post @ 10.23 yesterday.What are you pair on?

Sir John Curtice (polling guru) 

Writing in The Times, he said: "In the most disproportional electoral outcome in British electoral history, Labour’s strength in the new House of Commons is a heavily exaggerated reflection of the party’s limited popularity in the country.

"It is an outcome that may well breathe new life into the debate about electoral reform, perhaps not least within the Conservative Party."

Sir John also noted that Labour most likely lost voters to the Greens and that it had been badly hit by its support for Israel's war in Gaza.

The political scientist also believes that voters had failed to embrace Labour - despite rejecting the Tories.

Regarding votes cast, apparently Labour have lost in the past having gained more votes than they did this time. So for sure whereas a landslide of seats occurred, it was not accompanied by the landslide of support it should have implied. Many voters seem to have given up on the UK government this time around (possibly exasperated to an extent by the need to prove yourself with photo ID when that has never been an issue in the past), and the split caused by a disgraced Tory party continuing to stand candidates and consequently thwarting any emergence of a new government who seemed to be more in touch with what is needed; i.e. sorting causes of problems rather than sticking a plaster on symptoms.

 

Meanwhile the Labour aims seem very much a mixed bag. Some things definitely needing slinging asap. And it'll be interesting to see how it is all going to be funded.

//(possibly exasperated to an extent by the need to prove yourself with photo ID when that has never been an issue in the past)//

I was on poll clerk duty and the ID request was not a problem for the vast majority of voters. Perhaps 1 in a 100. These people knew that ID was required and all went home to fetch it. Again just 1 in a 100 had needed to apply for the voter ID document that was issued on request by the local Authority. Visual ID was always going to be necessary after allowing millions of people into the Country who have deliberately, in some cases, set out to deceive or thwart any effort to identify them. You are correct we have never previously needed Visual ID because we have never had an issue with organised cheating at the poll booth. We will unfortunately always need it henceforth, after importing the new and exciting attitudes to respect and fair play.  

Question Author

08:41 I think I preferred it when you were slagging off the Tories.

Not a problem for the vast majority of voters who turned up.

The Cons lost and Labour won no matter how you look at it Labour are oven ready and raring to go. They will repair Broken Britain.

21 to 40 of 49rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Reform Have Handed No 10 To Labour.....

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.