The Cricketer Tea Break Crossword
Crosswords1 min ago
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4875026.stm
Well do we agree with the Tory leader? I know this is going to be hard for the lefty's among you, can you bring yourselves to agree with a Tory? I'll wait for a few reponses before I put my twopence worth in.
No best answer has yet been selected by Loosehead. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I agree in principle with Mr Cameron's observations, but for him to make such a statement in his position on a BBC station is utterly unaccceptable, and UKIP are entirely justified in demanding an apology.
Having a personal opinion is one thing - voicing it in those terms on natioanl radio as leader of a major political party is another.
I think David Cameron could certainly of chose his words more wisely, I feel it was probably just inexpierience that did it. The problem for UKIP in my opinion is:- Put UK or a Union Flag into the equation and they end up being tarred with the same brush as the likes of the BNP, or Fathers for Justice, who both receive a bad press. But they don't help themselves do they.
All the same DC shouldn't have said it, and yes, he should apologise for his remarks. (In my opinon)
Fair enough don1, I read first, the Daily Mail, and then the Guardian, as for being too young to remember, I'm young enough to remember the Macmillan Goverment, so I think I can say I speak from experience.
We all have our views, you have yours, I have mine, and from my perspective, which has nothing to do with the question, this goverment is the most corrupt and sleaziest we've had, post war.
Trouble is Cameron has moved over so far left he's almost sitting in Browns lap. Not our Tony's note I say - he aint no lefty really is he ?.
As for racists, show me a party that has not got one in it.
And, not liking europe but not against Europeans, that is two totally different things.Europe is what they are using to descibe the huge beurocratic body that soaks money for all of us to pay the privildeged few a bucket load. Europens are the poor saps (Englishmen amongst them) who pay.
Wjhy should we have to provide proof of racism? Why can't we rely on what we read in the papers?
Why can't we point to RKS's 'anti-Mulim/anti-Arab' rhetoric
(see http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3376633.stm)?
Would you vote for a party who dismissed an entire set of people as "suicide bombers, limb-amputators, women repressors"? Why the hell are there so many apologisers for these scum?
This isn't the Old Bailey - we see what we see. And the UKIP would not get my vote or any other sensible person who does mouth words as they read or finds long division complex.
Former UKIP leader Alan Sked was quoted in the Mail on Sunday claiming the former party chairman and MEP Nick Farage told him: "We will never win the n****r vote. The n*g-n*gs will never vote for us."
Would anyone who believes that the UKIP is a party of love and acceptance like me to post a link to the story?
Not much to the point - although I suspect DC had political correctness in mind with the 'racist' bit - but I am eternally amused to think how all the lefties and 'Blair-bashers' are going to vote next time around !!
Will they have to bite the bullet and vote TORY ?
Or waste it on the Liberals ? Or not bother at all.