Donate SIGN UP
Home > News > Sadman Who's Sane

Sadman Who's Sane

Avatar Image
xyzzyplugh | 19:16 Wed 05th Feb 2003 | News
2 Answers
It's taken good old U.S. 12 years to decide to whack Saddam. Why? And is there a cat in hell's chance of U.S. withdrawing it's troops without killing, after they spent so much cash getting assembled?
prev not enough news questions?
  
next Is Lone Badman (anag.).
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 2 of 2rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by xyzzyplugh. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Avatar Image comloulou
They might be content with a bit of 'friendly fire'. That usually satisfies their bloodlust.
10:34 Thu 06th Feb 2003
Avatar Image DavidUK
If the aim of the US was really to get rid of Saddam I'm sure that, with all their money and resources, they could bump him off (including all of his doubles, if necessary). My guess is that what will actually happen is that countless numbers of poor Iraqi peasants will get whacked while Saddam will escape to a life of luxury somewhere else. I wonder who will be the next world number one enemy after Osama and now Saddam (both previously supported by the US)?
13:25 Thu 06th Feb 2003

1 to 2 of 2rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Sadman Who's Sane

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.