Editor's Blog1 min ago
Jonathon Ross's Salary
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by Kathyan. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.If you want your television to lose any semblence of innovation, then yes, scrap the licence fee.
If you want to see lowest common denominator television that seeks only to maximise it's audience, then yes, scrap the licence fee.
If you want to destroy probably the single most respected news gathering agency in the world, then yes, scrap the licence fee.
Jonathon Ross isn't worth �18M of anyone's money, but the BBC is not an institution worth losing. We'd all be poorer for it. Did you see the recent recommendation that perhaps Radio 1 and 2 should be privatised? Now, that is something worthy of discussion, IMO...
The licence fee covers all TV broadcasts and is channelled into a body which actually puts something (a hell of a lot actually) back into TV and radio.
This is exactly what doesn't happen when the Government gets directly involved e.g. less than a fifth of revenue raised from VED, Fuel (Duty and VAT) is returned to Roads & Public Transport.
I am aware that he will only pay in the UK but the fact is he has to pay or go without entertainment. What I cannot understand is why should they all have to pay when the Mess could be covered by one licence? Ooops sorry I know the answer to that one, more licences mean more money so that they can pay ridiculous salaries to co called celebrities.
The reason that Sainsburys is so much more expensive is because YOU are the suckers that are paying their advertising bills through ITV
For my part I am also just offering an opinion that is not in agreement with yours.
It seems to me that the crux of your argument is that the Mess could be covered by a licence (which is correct) but apparently isn't. Well surely you should be complaining about the MOD not the BBC.
The TV Licensing Authority only stipulates that TVs are "covered by a TV licence".
The Army could license a communal area for the use of their personnel, thus allowing access to a TV.
However if personnel want their own TVs in their "residences" then a separate licence is required. This is true of all businesses, student accommodation, tenancies etc. etc.
As for Ross's salary; of course it is exorbitant. I also think the same of salaries paid to film actors, footballers and especially the upper management of Insurance companies who decimate members' policies and yet receive huge bonuses and even worse claim a golden handshake when they leave.