News0 min ago
Who are the enemies?
Quite a few weeks ago, after watching a few films which certainly gave a distinctly different view on the 911atrocity in New York I was so incensed by the ramifications that I wrote to my MP, the BBC and 18 newspapers, both dailies and weekliesdetailing my concerns and offering them copies of they hadn't seen them.
I thought the views expressed on the films were completely water-tight and defenceless, but then who am I? I wanted them seen by those in the know and whose opinions were worth listening to.
So far I haven't had one reply.
Spooky
I thought the views expressed on the films were completely water-tight and defenceless, but then who am I? I wanted them seen by those in the know and whose opinions were worth listening to.
So far I haven't had one reply.
Spooky
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Garamond. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I saw a documentary, might have been called 'In Plane Sight' and one of the things I remember was about the plane that crashed into the Pentagon.
News footage and photos clearly show a relatively small round hole in the side of the building immediately following the crash, ie not passenger plane sized or shaped.
In the footage there were no signs of wings or tail sections amongst the wreckage.
There should have been a massive fireball but there wasn't.
In the rubble was found part of a jet engine, a jet engine that would not be found on the plane that supposedly crashed.
The petrol station opposite had it's cctv footage immediately confiscated. It took months for them to release anything and then it was only a few frames that proved nothing.
There was also something about the lamp posts outside, but I can't quite remember what was wrong with them.
There were loads and loads of odd things that just don't add up if you believe the official story.
News footage and photos clearly show a relatively small round hole in the side of the building immediately following the crash, ie not passenger plane sized or shaped.
In the footage there were no signs of wings or tail sections amongst the wreckage.
There should have been a massive fireball but there wasn't.
In the rubble was found part of a jet engine, a jet engine that would not be found on the plane that supposedly crashed.
The petrol station opposite had it's cctv footage immediately confiscated. It took months for them to release anything and then it was only a few frames that proved nothing.
There was also something about the lamp posts outside, but I can't quite remember what was wrong with them.
There were loads and loads of odd things that just don't add up if you believe the official story.
Llamatron, if this is true and the USA government we so good at this behind the scenes stuff, why didn't they stop the documentary being made? If what you propose is true that this would have been eeeeeeeeasy!! and why not execute the makers (frame them for a murder or something). But this hasn't happened so like I said above, a film about these conspiricys (sp) is actual PROOF that they don't exist!
You might be interested in this :
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=786692 9448192753501
Its on for an hour and a half but DEFO worth a watch
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=786692 9448192753501
Its on for an hour and a half but DEFO worth a watch
