ChatterBank1 min ago
Who are the enemies?
Quite a few weeks ago, after watching a few films which certainly gave a distinctly different view on the 911atrocity in New York I was so incensed by the ramifications that I wrote to my MP, the BBC and 18 newspapers, both dailies and weekliesdetailing my concerns and offering them copies of they hadn't seen them.
I thought the views expressed on the films were completely water-tight and defenceless, but then who am I? I wanted them seen by those in the know and whose opinions were worth listening to.
So far I haven't had one reply.
Spooky
I thought the views expressed on the films were completely water-tight and defenceless, but then who am I? I wanted them seen by those in the know and whose opinions were worth listening to.
So far I haven't had one reply.
Spooky
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Garamond. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Hiya Dizzie
There's been three. Each made by professional journalists and scientists and they have, in my opinion, incontrovertible evidence, that it wasn't an outrage by any outside sources but by the US government themselves.
There are films played back in slow speed which highlights that explosions occurred on the planes immediately before they hit, that the hole in the Pentagon was too small to have been made by a plane, that Bin Laden was being looked after at a hospital somewhere, I can't remember where, by the Americans and that all the alleged bombers can prove they were elsewhere in the world.
As for the Trade Centre buildings, there's evidence that it was a controlled explosion primarily to raise the buildings to the ground; that there were explosive charges being laid for weeks before that fateful day.
It's all too involved to go into here, but I think everyone should see them and form their own conclusions.
It isn't for me to say this or that, but I have my own opinions and I think others should have the same option.
There's been three. Each made by professional journalists and scientists and they have, in my opinion, incontrovertible evidence, that it wasn't an outrage by any outside sources but by the US government themselves.
There are films played back in slow speed which highlights that explosions occurred on the planes immediately before they hit, that the hole in the Pentagon was too small to have been made by a plane, that Bin Laden was being looked after at a hospital somewhere, I can't remember where, by the Americans and that all the alleged bombers can prove they were elsewhere in the world.
As for the Trade Centre buildings, there's evidence that it was a controlled explosion primarily to raise the buildings to the ground; that there were explosive charges being laid for weeks before that fateful day.
It's all too involved to go into here, but I think everyone should see them and form their own conclusions.
It isn't for me to say this or that, but I have my own opinions and I think others should have the same option.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
I don't think so, and if my efforts never bring forth fruit, I doubt whether there ever will be. As far as everyone is concened there's no doubt who did it and why.
If you're interested I can send you the dvds. I'll leave you my email addy and if you want to reply with an address, not yours, obviously, just one from which you can retrieve them, I'll gladly send them.
[email protected]
If you're interested I can send you the dvds. I'll leave you my email addy and if you want to reply with an address, not yours, obviously, just one from which you can retrieve them, I'll gladly send them.
[email protected]
Seen them all and it is all a load of rubbish. Do you not think that people would have noticed if explosive charges were being laid around the towers weeks in advance?
Also (and unfortunaltely I can't find it at the moment) there is a security video which actually shows the plane hitting the White House.
Also (and unfortunaltely I can't find it at the moment) there is a security video which actually shows the plane hitting the White House.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Hiya admarlow
I assume you've seen the films. You obviously can't have opinions without having seen them can you? or can you?
Your comments remind me of a phrase I once heard. 'Don't sit back and just look stupid - open your mouth and remove all doubt'.
There's something even more dangerous than terrorits and that's a closed mind.
I assume you've seen the films. You obviously can't have opinions without having seen them can you? or can you?
Your comments remind me of a phrase I once heard. 'Don't sit back and just look stupid - open your mouth and remove all doubt'.
There's something even more dangerous than terrorits and that's a closed mind.
It's such a shame - I was hoping for some INFORMED comment, not the ramblings of people so deaf they don't wanna hear.
My posting concerned three films I've seen yet most of the responders have such clear ideas of what's happened without even bothering to hear both sides of the question.
No wonder people like Hitler found it so easy.
My posting concerned three films I've seen yet most of the responders have such clear ideas of what's happened without even bothering to hear both sides of the question.
No wonder people like Hitler found it so easy.