ChatterBank0 min ago
Saddam Hussein To Be Executed
Is this a fitting end for this tyrant? Personally, I would prefer to see him imprisoned, for two reasons. 1) Regardless of his crime, I cannot bring myself to feel approval for the death penalty, and 2) I think that his death will have terrible repurcussions, first in Iraq, but then in a much wider sphere, possibly here also in the U.K.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Difficult ....if they hang him he will become a martyr ..if they imprison him ..he will demand the usual conditions which means he will end up like Hess ..guarded over by various powers that be ..the Americans or us because it looks like a long haul in Iraq.This is not a war that can be sorted out just by getting rid of a dictator .Do they really think that by hanging him all their problems will be solved at the drop of a rope .I don't think so.If anything it will cause more hate and discontent .
I think that we have dug ourselves into a very deep hole which will take a long time to dig ourselves out of. This war is another Vietnam and hanging Saddam won't solve the problem only exacerbate it .
I think that we have dug ourselves into a very deep hole which will take a long time to dig ourselves out of. This war is another Vietnam and hanging Saddam won't solve the problem only exacerbate it .
-- answer removed --
I think the situation goes deeper than the recent war. It concerns the genocide of Saddam's people having used some as guinea pigs and not so much the recent war (brought about by a country that lusts for another countries oil) I cannot comprehend or accept the laws in the Middle East as what the people are brought up to believe in and to accept as their way of life....stoning, hands chopped off, and so much more, BUT this is their way of life and all that they know and abide by and the laws pf their Country that they were born in. There were never any WMD's Saddam ruled harshly to the outsiders point of view and he was cruel in many ways and his people knew no better as they had lived under previous tyrants/rulers who instigated much the same laws that more civilized nations find abhorrent. This continuing war has achieved nothing but made a volatile situation much worse. Saddam is in some ways a scapegoat and in other ways guilty of genocide. Whether he is hung or is incarcerated in prison he will become and remain a martyr, but to what and whose cause? He has psychologically won this war and his death will light a terrible fuse.
I agree with nox on this. For starters, death is far too quick a solution for someone who has taken so many lives. Prison, hard labour and life on only the very basic of provisions. Then perhaps recordings of the voices and cries of the families he destroyed piped into his cell every day. But is this feasible? Probably not. But, I don't believe that taking Saddam's life will accomplish anything in a positive sense. In ancient times and in some countries even today, people like him were / are made to walk among the bereaved, who then stone the murderer. But again, what does this achieve? A brief moment of revenge for the families? Nobody can bring their sons and daughters back. Nobody can give them their "normal" life back again. And as much as we may not like it, many Iraqis see the British and American soldiers and politicians as murderers. So where does it all end? I don't know what the solution is. Saddam will remain a negative and dangerous influence on daily life, whether he hangs or not!
I can think of many other tyrants equally bad or far worse, ie- Milosevic, Pinochet etc who've either gotten away with it completely or escaped the death penalty in favor of life imprisonment ... I don't think executing Saddam will resolve anything, it seems one bad decision follows another re Iraq and his execution is certainly not going to help the current situation there.
it's worth saying that there are serious doubts that this was a fair trial, claims that his lawyers weren't given details of the charges against him etc. Killing him may serve the purposes of the USA and UK and some Iraqis; but it's quite likely that he'd have been granted a retrial if he'd actually been tried in America or Britain. It all smells like victor's justice; but can we say it's all justified because Iraq is now better off than it was before?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.