Donate SIGN UP

huntley & carr

Avatar Image
paulz | 09:02 Thu 18th Dec 2003 | News
4 Answers
I always thought only previous convictions were read out after a verdict, not allegations; [no matter how relevant] is this a new idea. I think he's as guilty as hell, so don't get the wrong idea. Also if only for the families, classmates of the girls, people of Soham & those who worked on the case; I think the media & TV specials ought to be wound down. Isn't it strange all the experts have appeared 'I knew he was guilty by his body language etc '' are now appearing.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by paulz. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The allegations weren't read out in Court - and in any case would have made no difference to Huntley's life sentences. They were brought to light by the BBC and other media,
Some of his previous alleged crimes were a matter of public record having been published in a local paper in Grimsby, where they are both originally from, so there was no problem in getting this info...The only reason the Beeb and others didn't splash the info about sooner was publishing restrictions so as not to bias any jurors.

Actually I watched the beeb's programme last night and must say that everyone expressed the opposite opinion to you, in that Carr at least, was a hugely convincing liar up to the point they presented her with the forensic evidence.

I'm pleased that they had fair trials.
My response has just been zapped!?! Am I been vetted or something?

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Do you know the answer?

huntley & carr

Answer Question >>