700 pedophiles arrested !!!

[legend758duo]

Read this story just makes you think you really dont know who youre talking to online does it?
The host of the pedo site was a 27 year old from buxhall in suffolk.
Makes you think tho ??

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070618/ap_on_re_e u/britain_pedophile_ring

[legend759]

sorry jno.
700 men who watched kiddy porn online.
case over .
guilty.
im sorry are you one of the folk who fall for pete townshend and the likes "im doing research for a book" alibi???
people who come on these sites by mistake would first log out.then secondly contact the police.
otherwise they are looking for their own pleasure.
according to reports the 700 were viewing child sex abuse not porn but abuse !!!
the police have been running the site for months gathering info.

all praise to them for some of the images theyve had to see and for having to act the pedo too.
must be mentally draining and very upsetting if they have kids.

as you said pedos are online and you dont know who youre talking to.

[legend759]

infund i fail to get the point of your conspiracy theory rant.
can you simplify it ?
it did seem you were condoning the acts as the people were just responding to market forces???

if that is your opinion its a very sick one then.

[jno]

'according to reports'

[legend759]

jno.
are you sympathetic towards paedophiles?
because your views are rather disturbing in this day and age.
whats your problem here?
would you like to explain perhaps??

[legend759]

in fun.
your attempts to support these paedophiles is disgraceful.
to then blame it on marketforces is stupidity beyond belief.
noone can defend these guys who were caught and convicted.
your attempts to justify what theyve done leads me to question your personal opinion of paedophilia and wether you have any such feelings or desires towards young children yourself?

[legend759]

the guys the ppost refers to.
are you living in sleepy holow?
dont you even know what the post is about?
are you so patently stupid that you post answers without reading the main post???
timothy cox the sites admin "Cox lived with his parents, sister and 26-year-old girlfriend in a large farmhouse and worked at the family's micro-brewery. The website was operated from his bedroom. "

read the information on this link from the bbc.
you fool.
these guys were abusing kids online to order.
is that the market forces youre talking about?
you are stupid beyond belief.
and your views on paedophiles seems to lean towards sympathetic if you can attempt to excuse them.

the guy cox said he saw a gap in the market.
are you one of his customers perhaps???

[legend759]

Detective Constable Stefan Jochan said: "He doesn't fit any kind of traditional image of paedophile. He had a veneer of respectability."

do you have a venneer of respectability???

im off to bed.
i can sleep.
wonder if your concience lets you????????

[legend759]

take care.
sorry if i dont understand what youre saying.
but it wouldnt be the first post of yours that made no sense.
try to resist the market forces.
seek help.

[sp1814]

That was by far and away the most confusing set of posts I've ever, ever, ever read.

Congratulations to infundibulum.

[Pippa68]

700 paedophiles? blimey, I wonder what % that is of the entire paedophile population.

A small one, I think.

sp ~ I too have often wondered why homosexuals are compared to paedophiles. Sure there are homosexual paedophiles..there are also heterosexual ones. The gay=paedophile analogy never has made any sense to me.

[jno]

I just believe you're innocent until proved guilty. This happens to be the law, and has been for some centuries now. I suppose you'd prefer to execute them all at once on the basis that you read on the internet that they were guilty? Even though you've just admitted that nobody knows the truth of anything or anyone they read on the internet? Such self-confidence... you're not Tony Blair, are you?

[legend758duo]

sorry i think in cases like thios .and when faced with the stupidity of folk like infun.
who talk of market forces as if children being abused is a comodity to be bartered on the internet and not be wrong.
im totally disgusted that anyone would give anytime to such stupid ideas.
sp what total rubbish you are talking .
jno the people werent accused of being guilty .
do you live on a desert island these people were found guilty in a court of law of distributing sexual abuse videos of babies.
yes babies!!!
now im sorry if you are so sick that you think thats ok then perhaps you are on a watch list.
im sorry the police continued using the chat site.
running it as admin.
and collected the names of 700 people who were swopping child sex abuse videos.
now iss that clear enough for you?
i fail to see wheer innocence comes in if youre willing to wait in a queue for a child porn video for 70 minutes???
forget infuns rubbish go read the newspapers or check online .
guilty no doubt no way oput no excusse .end of story.


what if it was your kid??
the police did rescue 31 children ,some babies who were being sexually abused.
is that ok??

[mycats]

I understand what you mean about 'innocent till proven guilty' JNO - but not in this case. These 'people' WERE looking at, downloading and encouraging abuse of children and babies!!!

[legend758duo]

jno they are guilty thats my point.
end of.
do you watch child sex abuse?
no?
that will be because youre not a paedophile.
if you did.
and were caught.
would you be guilty?
yes?
well seems we are in agreement and im glad we cleared that up .