Donate SIGN UP

At the expese of rate payers

Avatar Image
Hellyon | 13:13 Wed 11th Jul 2007 | News
47 Answers
Ken Livingstone is planning on spending �100 million of rate payers money on a mega mosque in London that will be bigger than St Paul's cathedral.
I have no objections to mosques at all but I do think spending �100 million of ratepayers money ( when churches have to fund their own building and repair) extraordinary. Setting aside the fact that based on previous big builds like Wembley, Millenium Dome and Olympic village all seem to end up cost double the estimate the final bill could be �200 million.
It's only going to cause a lot of bad feeling at a partcicularly sensitive time.
Surely the money would be better spent on hospitals, community centres etc?

Read more here
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml? xml=/opinion/2006/09/25/do2502.xml

Any one who wants to sign the petition iagainst it t's here
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/ScrapMegaMosque/
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 47rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Hellyon. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
does it matter who paying for it try building a cathedral in a muslem country
What kind of argument is that? 'What we deem lawful should be determined on the basis of what is allowed in countries of which we disapprove.'

That way madness lies.
I think that the way Islamic countries organise their society and legal structure should inform us and we should take careful note.

Islamabad today, London tomorrow.

And yes, I happen to agree, if you can't build a simple Christian place of worship in an Islamic state, then I am danmed if they should be allowed to build mosques here.


There are plenty of churches in Iraq - and Tariq Aziz (Saddams Aide & deputy PM) was a practising Christian.

Trust you no longer have an issue whiffey
I remember the bare bones of this story - a huge mosque is being built on a brownfield site in East London, and the build is being funded privately.

As far as I can recall...those are the facts of the story (if anyone has a link to the real story, please post).

You cannot compare it to building a cathedral in a Muslim country, because we don't pray to God anymore.

No - every Sunday, we pray to the holy trinity of Ikea, B&Q and Sainsbury's Homebase.

Signing a petition??? I only hope those who sign have the courtesy to find out at least some of the facts.
yes i signed it and why not, i dont want one here and thats all their is too it. this is britain keep it that way
gina32this is britain keep it that way

What do you think Britain stands for then? Banning of religious buildings? Do you think all religious buildings should be knocked down of just not CoE ones? What about Catholic churches? What about Hindu Temples?
sp, I do compare it to the building of Christian churches in Islamic countries. You may not pray to God anymore (it is not politically correct) but please do not think to answer for everybody else.

For my part and my vote, there should be no more mosques built in Britain. It's an irrational belief that flashed across my mind after seeing that all the bombers were Muslim and none were Christian. I expect it's an extraordinary coincidence, and I am probably being racist and religionist.

you are, whiffey.
whiffey

Honestly - are you really of the opinion that Christianity and the worship of God has become politically incorrect?

Seriously...that's something even Daily Mail journalists would reject as being a bit...out there.

From what you post, I wouldn't say you're being racist or religionist (a new term to me)...what you seem to be displaying is a more fundamental human trait.

You're scared and anxious because you believe that the world and Britain in particular is becoming a more dangerous place.

You may be right, you may be wrong. Who knows.

But I'll give you an anaolgy...two neighbours three streets away have been burgled...you buy an alarm, then a big doberman, then a you put barbed wire up around your property and install a huge lighting system.

After that, you hand out permits for people to walk past your house and you sit by the window with a shotgun.

All these measures may very well prevent you from being burgled...but by doing that - you lose everything else. You lose your joy in life. You lose any hope of leaving your house...

That's the best I can come up with.

A few year ago, when I lived in Brixton, and worked in Aldgate (near Brick Lane) and clubbed in Soho, there was that mad bomber who set off bombs in (ta-dah!) Brixton, Brick Lane and Old Compton Street.

You cannot live your life to accommodate your worst fears.



-- answer removed --
A quick question for all the grumblers who are opposing the mosque because 'This is Britain and it should stay that way'.

In that case, why are you trying to turn it into Germany circa 1939?

I hate to throw the Nazi accusation around but take a look at what you're saying and then compare it to the treatment of Jews in pre-war Germany. And don't go thinking that was the work of some crazy dictator, flying in the face of public opinion. Hitler was acting on a wave of support from people who hated having Jews in their country. Just like many of you hate having Muslims here.

Never mind claiming to be standing up for Britain. Britain actually fought a war against people like you.
Jake - I've got a wild story about Ken: he's an anti-semite.....oops, no, hold on - that's true.

Anyway.........

Isn't it ironic how (if true) this huge mosque built in the UK will be funded by Saudi money and yet Christianity, and even the possession of a bible, is illegal in Saudi.

Illegal for gawd's sake.

Madness
Yep, madness. Couldn't agree more.

So are you suggesting we copy that approach? What would that make us?
flip-flop
If you had read Waldo McFrogg's earlier post you would realise he had already pointed out that in this country, we would hardly want to model what is or isn't permissible on the basis of regimes that operate in other countries particularly Saudia Arabia.
There is a difference between not believing that the British way of life is just teetering on the edge of extinction due to a take over by fundamentalist Muslims, and recognising that many countries including those that are predominately Muslim have less than attractive legal and social framework.
Eh?
How about, Ken Livingstone is now giving muslims priority for council housing because they cannot be housed on Fridays?
Ignoring the 'not on my turf' mentality, why is nobody bemoaning the fact that a Christian church is being demolished to make way for the Olympics? Perhaps one should petition to save that if they feel strongly enough about their state religion?

As I said prev. the mosque is to be scaled down to 12,000 capacity and is only likely to have about 6,000 at any one time. Planning permission is likely to be resubmitted early next year. It will be in the main, funded privately.
I wonder how many of those objecting to the mosque are actual christians..or even care about churches?

It seems as though it is usually the non church goers who bang on about this being a 'christian country' whilst being totally un-christian.
Actually Pippa, I have studied carefully the evidence for the Resurrection of Christ and it is very very compelling.

I suppose that makes me a Christian.

21 to 40 of 47rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

At the expese of rate payers

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.