A 44yr old black man walks free from court with a smirk on his face after being convicted of a vicious attack on a 96yr old war veteran, which was unprovoked and leaves him with loss of vision in one eye. Is this justice?
Thought that may stir up a hornets nest! I stated his colour because HE WAS BLACK!!! If he had been say a chinaman I would have said that! Why not, am only stated fact.
Why not TCL ? The sentence is ludicrously inconsistent with the crime, the attacker is black, the victim is white, it is Croydon, and these matters are of public concern to the dimjinishing white population.
It is a statement of fact, but with undertones that dare not speak their name.
I can honestly say that when I seen the picture in the paper earlier, I didn't notice the colour of the attacker. If both had been white, how would you feel?
For gods sake Corbyloon, why must you be so politically correct. If news reporters were to leave out relevant facts, what would be the point of writing a news item? People like you seem to want to take away freedoom of speech.