Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
BBC fine
The BBC have been fined for it's competition phone scandal. The licence payers will end up footing this bill. Why did the courts not make them pay a rebate to all licence payers instead? Then, at least, the BBC would lose out and not the licence payers.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Kathyan. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.All fines by these regulatory bodies go to HM Paymaster General, just as when Postcomm fined Royal Mail �11.7m in 2006 and the OFT fined supermarkets and milk processors �116m for price fixing last December. Therefore when a private company or public service receives a fine it will return to the Treasury for the (supposed) benefit of the general public.
My favourite nonsensical penalty was the FSA handing out a �980,000 fine to Nationwide BS for security lapses after mislaying a laptop containing customer information. The Nationwide is a mutual society (i.e. the members are effectively the shareholders) therefore any fine imposed on the institution is a fine on the customers - net effect: customers pay the Treasury for the privilege of having their details compromised.
My favourite nonsensical penalty was the FSA handing out a �980,000 fine to Nationwide BS for security lapses after mislaying a laptop containing customer information. The Nationwide is a mutual society (i.e. the members are effectively the shareholders) therefore any fine imposed on the institution is a fine on the customers - net effect: customers pay the Treasury for the privilege of having their details compromised.
How can the BBC ever lose out without licence payers also losing out - any penalty removed from the licence income will ultimately be reflected in the broadcast output.
Not quite sure how giving a �250million rebate to licence payers, as you propose, would not reduce the quality of service more than the current �400,000.
Not quite sure how giving a �250million rebate to licence payers, as you propose, would not reduce the quality of service more than the current �400,000.