Body & Soul5 mins ago
I can't figure this out
24 Answers
http://www.metro.co.uk/news/world/article.html ?Female_archer_kills_elephant_for_a_bet&in_art icle_id=648555&in_page_id=64
I am absolutely disgusted with the woman in this article but I can't fathom out what point of view the Metro are taking. There is no indication of whether they are reporting it as a wrong doing or just highlighting the fact that a female hunter has killed her first elephant with a bow and arrow.
I would be grateful for your take on this please.
Thank you
I am absolutely disgusted with the woman in this article but I can't fathom out what point of view the Metro are taking. There is no indication of whether they are reporting it as a wrong doing or just highlighting the fact that a female hunter has killed her first elephant with a bow and arrow.
I would be grateful for your take on this please.
Thank you
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by tiggerblue10. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It's actually a very good example of a well reported story. It's not perfect - it reports the remarks of a pro-hunting source but not a rebuttal - but in presenting the facts it does what news should do and leave you as reader to make up your own mind.
This could make you think about how the American style of news-crossing-into-opinion has replaced factual reporting on this side of the atlantic. Almost every newspaper and tv/radio news here now is tainted by bias.
This could make you think about how the American style of news-crossing-into-opinion has replaced factual reporting on this side of the atlantic. Almost every newspaper and tv/radio news here now is tainted by bias.
It's true that culling of elephant herds is "necessary", and that allowing hunters to shoot selected animals raises revenue for the relevant reserve.
However, what gets me about this story (I was trying to read it over the shoulder of someone on the train into work this morning), and now having re-read it, is that in the printed version [of Metro], it states;
"The Kansas woman described how she fired one arrow to injure the animal before leaving it to die overnight"
Oh yes I am the Great White Hunter...... not.
However, what gets me about this story (I was trying to read it over the shoulder of someone on the train into work this morning), and now having re-read it, is that in the printed version [of Metro], it states;
"The Kansas woman described how she fired one arrow to injure the animal before leaving it to die overnight"
Oh yes I am the Great White Hunter...... not.
In answer to the question I think the tone is condemnatory (if that is a word) in a subtle way.
They mention that she 'boasted' about it (twice). They emphasis that she did it 'for a bet' - the insinuation being that she did it for no good reason. It is written in a kind of weird flat style which could either be deliberate or just bad writing, but that's how I see it - subtley disapproving.
They mention that she 'boasted' about it (twice). They emphasis that she did it 'for a bet' - the insinuation being that she did it for no good reason. It is written in a kind of weird flat style which could either be deliberate or just bad writing, but that's how I see it - subtley disapproving.
Hi Tigger.
I'm not interested in whether the reporting was good or bad, but it's controversial at the least, and horrible at the worst.
Who decided that elephants need to be culled? They're extremely intelligent and loving animals - one of a few to cry over their dead young, and I think that woman's sick.
I'm not interested in whether the reporting was good or bad, but it's controversial at the least, and horrible at the worst.
Who decided that elephants need to be culled? They're extremely intelligent and loving animals - one of a few to cry over their dead young, and I think that woman's sick.
Ice, elephants need to be culled if the land can't support them. They require huge amounts of land - they can cover 50 miles a night, stomping all the vegetation in their path. African countries don't lightly cull them, because safaris are always a good money-spinner. But humans need land too, and sometimes there just isn't enough to go round. I have no idea whether bows and arrows are more or less painful than bullets, though.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/726295 1.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/726295 1.stm