Film, Media & TV0 min ago
Enough is enough
27 Answers
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-118716 5/Nine-arrested-masked-mobs-march-Muslim-extre mists-turns-violent.html
Yesterday! What can we expect in the future?
Interesting to note that the police didn't dive in hard, when the Islamists protested during an Army march in Luton earlier this year, in fact if one looks at the picture there doesn't seem many around at all.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/05/25/arti cle-1187165-03EA02F5000005DC-710_634x418.jpg
Yesterday! What can we expect in the future?
Interesting to note that the police didn't dive in hard, when the Islamists protested during an Army march in Luton earlier this year, in fact if one looks at the picture there doesn't seem many around at all.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/05/25/arti cle-1187165-03EA02F5000005DC-710_634x418.jpg
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Interesting to note that the police didn't dive in hard, when the Islamists protested during an Army march
That's because, as far as I know, none of the Islamists - despicable though I think their message was - broke off from the escorted route and started causing trouble. All of those arrested in this case seem to have come from the group that did so, and the main group appear to have been left alone.
Police are always present at such protests - just 'cause they're not in the picture, doesn't mean they're not there.
That's because, as far as I know, none of the Islamists - despicable though I think their message was - broke off from the escorted route and started causing trouble. All of those arrested in this case seem to have come from the group that did so, and the main group appear to have been left alone.
Police are always present at such protests - just 'cause they're not in the picture, doesn't mean they're not there.
anotheoldgit - Are you sure that the picture with green flags is what you think it is? Because as far as I can see and what it says on those flags (I can read the language) it seems like that they are celebrating the birthday of Muhammad (pbuh).
I am sure if they had to protest then the message would definitely have been in English so the others could read and understand it. Just like this.
http://unambig.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/pro test.jpg
I am sure if they had to protest then the message would definitely have been in English so the others could read and understand it. Just like this.
http://unambig.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/pro test.jpg
AOG,
Sorry, you are victim of the Mail's sloppy journalism again. The photo you used was not taken in Luton, and was not the rabble abusing soldiers.
the real Luton Protestors can be seen here...
http://www.document.no/assets_c/2009/03/uk.lut on.protest-thumb-520x315.jpg
I am sure this was a genuine mistake by the Mail. They have obviously used any old photo of muslim protestors, and did not try and pass it off as the actual protestors. And, reassuringly, there appears to be plenty of Police officers keeping an eye on things in the photo taken in Luton that day.
I have been on my holidays, so I would have corrected this obvious error earlier.
Sorry, you are victim of the Mail's sloppy journalism again. The photo you used was not taken in Luton, and was not the rabble abusing soldiers.
the real Luton Protestors can be seen here...
http://www.document.no/assets_c/2009/03/uk.lut on.protest-thumb-520x315.jpg
I am sure this was a genuine mistake by the Mail. They have obviously used any old photo of muslim protestors, and did not try and pass it off as the actual protestors. And, reassuringly, there appears to be plenty of Police officers keeping an eye on things in the photo taken in Luton that day.
I have been on my holidays, so I would have corrected this obvious error earlier.
Welcome back Gromit.
Thank you for your pictures keyplus and Gromit.
What is the matter with the Daily Mail? It seems they are trying to dampen the muslin's protest down. If they had printed those two pictures it would have had a much more impact.
Who are they to call our brave troops butchers, this is ripe coming from the most beastly religion in the whole world.To think that perhaps some day these same troops may be called upon to protect them and their families.
The likes of these cowardly traitors should never be in this country. Fly them over to Iraq and Afghanistan then kick them out of the plane, for our troops have a go at them there. It's a fact that nobody is allowed to have a go at them in this country, thanks to our mealy mouthed politicians.
Thank you for your pictures keyplus and Gromit.
What is the matter with the Daily Mail? It seems they are trying to dampen the muslin's protest down. If they had printed those two pictures it would have had a much more impact.
Who are they to call our brave troops butchers, this is ripe coming from the most beastly religion in the whole world.To think that perhaps some day these same troops may be called upon to protect them and their families.
The likes of these cowardly traitors should never be in this country. Fly them over to Iraq and Afghanistan then kick them out of the plane, for our troops have a go at them there. It's a fact that nobody is allowed to have a go at them in this country, thanks to our mealy mouthed politicians.
What is the matter with the Daily Mail? It seems they are trying to dampen the muslin's protest down. If they had printed those two pictures it would have had a much more impact.
Hello AOG, Had a great holiday,
The picture the Daily Mail printed showed representatives from the whole (male) community: children, young men, old men, disabled. It showed many people complete with flags with squiggly foreign writing. The image portrayed was that the whole community was abusing the soldiers, and not just an handful of nutters which we can see in the second photo.
The Mail's false photo will upset the AOGs of this world who think we have been invaded, more than the true photo where we see just four bearded extremists with placards in english.
I am sure the Mail wouldn't deliberately print a more provocative false picture on purpose just to make its readers blood boil.
Hello AOG, Had a great holiday,
The picture the Daily Mail printed showed representatives from the whole (male) community: children, young men, old men, disabled. It showed many people complete with flags with squiggly foreign writing. The image portrayed was that the whole community was abusing the soldiers, and not just an handful of nutters which we can see in the second photo.
The Mail's false photo will upset the AOGs of this world who think we have been invaded, more than the true photo where we see just four bearded extremists with placards in english.
I am sure the Mail wouldn't deliberately print a more provocative false picture on purpose just to make its readers blood boil.
The Mail's false photo will upset the AOGs of this world who think we have been invaded, more than the true photo where we see just four bearded extremists with placards in english
Well I will put it to the vote of the AOGs of this world/site.
Which photo got your blood boiling the most the one of the Muslims flying their flags, or the ones with the bearded scum bag traitors holding up their offensive placards?
Incidentally I see you chose to use the photo that Keyplus posted instead of the one you posted Gromit. Could it be because there are many more than just four bearded extremists with placards in your photo.
Sloppy posting Gromit, or does the photo Keyplus posted fit your argument better?
Well I will put it to the vote of the AOGs of this world/site.
Which photo got your blood boiling the most the one of the Muslims flying their flags, or the ones with the bearded scum bag traitors holding up their offensive placards?
Incidentally I see you chose to use the photo that Keyplus posted instead of the one you posted Gromit. Could it be because there are many more than just four bearded extremists with placards in your photo.
Sloppy posting Gromit, or does the photo Keyplus posted fit your argument better?
Its very simple. Daily Mail could have easily thought about few things and had avoided this mistake.
When people go on protest, last thing they want is to elderly and disabled in wheel chair with them as well as children as young as has popped his head through car's sun roof just above the man on wheelie. Even if they had decided not to have stayed behind then at least they wouldn't have been right at the front.
When people go on protest, last thing they want is to elderly and disabled in wheel chair with them as well as children as young as has popped his head through car's sun roof just above the man on wheelie. Even if they had decided not to have stayed behind then at least they wouldn't have been right at the front.
It's a fact that nobody is allowed to have a go at them in this country.
But you do quite regularly. As do plenty of other people on this site.
Just today, I was having my hair cut and a chap in the seat next to me was quite happily spouting off about muslims.
To a less blunt degree, so do the Express/The Sun (and sometimes the Mail).
But you do quite regularly. As do plenty of other people on this site.
Just today, I was having my hair cut and a chap in the seat next to me was quite happily spouting off about muslims.
To a less blunt degree, so do the Express/The Sun (and sometimes the Mail).
It turns out the Mail had the right photo all along.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1162 030/PETER-HITCHENS-What-expect-treat-nation-co ntempt.html
I wonder how they erroneously used the picture of the large menacing crowd instead of the half dozen wallies?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1162 030/PETER-HITCHENS-What-expect-treat-nation-co ntempt.html
I wonder how they erroneously used the picture of the large menacing crowd instead of the half dozen wallies?
Keyplus90
children as young as has popped his head through car's sun roof just above the man on wheelie. Even if they had decided not to have stayed behind then at least they wouldn't have been right at the front.
Yes I see what you mean, best not have children right at the front of a protest, but then what is this? Bottom left of the picture.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/05/18/arti cle-1184251-04FE4A9F000005DC-666_634x422.jpg
Absolutely disgusting, but then I suppose life is cheap to them.
children as young as has popped his head through car's sun roof just above the man on wheelie. Even if they had decided not to have stayed behind then at least they wouldn't have been right at the front.
Yes I see what you mean, best not have children right at the front of a protest, but then what is this? Bottom left of the picture.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/05/18/arti cle-1184251-04FE4A9F000005DC-666_634x422.jpg
Absolutely disgusting, but then I suppose life is cheap to them.
Gromit
Four, now you have increased it to six, should you go to specsavers, or have you come off your hols with sand in your eyes?
The numbers don't matter, it doesn't take one from the fact that the one depicting those traitors insulting our forces is the most infuriating of the two, and the Mail would have done better if they had used this one when reporting the story of the white Luton protesters.
It would have put the matter more into perspective, of why the White's had been driven to this extreme action.
Much more than a picture of a few more Muslims flying flags that mean nothing to us, could ever do.
Four, now you have increased it to six, should you go to specsavers, or have you come off your hols with sand in your eyes?
The numbers don't matter, it doesn't take one from the fact that the one depicting those traitors insulting our forces is the most infuriating of the two, and the Mail would have done better if they had used this one when reporting the story of the white Luton protesters.
It would have put the matter more into perspective, of why the White's had been driven to this extreme action.
Much more than a picture of a few more Muslims flying flags that mean nothing to us, could ever do.
