ChatterBank2 mins ago
Public enquiries, why?
Why do people demand a public enquiry at the drop of a hat? When they do have one it cost zillions and they always find out it's no ones fault especially the government. FFS what more is here to rake over with the gulf war? It's just a lawyers field day. Surely there are more pressing problems to deal with.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by R1Geezer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.As you say, it will turn out to be nobody's fault, but alot of recommendations will be made.
When the same thing happens again there'll be another enquiry at which it will be agreed that one of the reasons it happened again is because no-one took any notice of the recommendations that were made at the previous enquiry. Again that will be nobody'e fault because they were only recommendations and no-one was actually obliged to do anything.
When the same thing happens again there'll be another enquiry at which it will be agreed that one of the reasons it happened again is because no-one took any notice of the recommendations that were made at the previous enquiry. Again that will be nobody'e fault because they were only recommendations and no-one was actually obliged to do anything.
-- answer removed --
Yes Gromit but what will raking over it acheive, I can write what happenned in a short paragraph:
Nasty bloke pi55ed of Bush senior, Bush junior needed to sort it, Tony Blair hung on to coat tails, using threat of WMD, to get support. WMD's not found, nasty bloke gone anyway, new governemnet installed, indiginous population now waiting for allies to go home so they can have a civil war.
Nasty bloke pi55ed of Bush senior, Bush junior needed to sort it, Tony Blair hung on to coat tails, using threat of WMD, to get support. WMD's not found, nasty bloke gone anyway, new governemnet installed, indiginous population now waiting for allies to go home so they can have a civil war.
In an ideal world, those culpable for leading us into disasterous wars, for shooting innocent members of the public on the tube, or in charge of a football match where 96 people died, would do the honourable thing and resign.
But now there are so many chiefs, managers and middle managers, that each cling on to their jobs, blame each other and nothing changes to stop it happening again.
But now there are so many chiefs, managers and middle managers, that each cling on to their jobs, blame each other and nothing changes to stop it happening again.
-- answer removed --
a cabal of Tony's cronies
Oh you mean the cabinet
That's how government works, the prime-minister selects advisors and makes decisions.
Or do you think we should have had a referendum?
I seem to remember there was even a vote in the house of commons.
I don't recall a vote on the Falklands.
Perhaps Tony was a more democratic leader than Maggie? What do you think?
Oh you mean the cabinet
That's how government works, the prime-minister selects advisors and makes decisions.
Or do you think we should have had a referendum?
I seem to remember there was even a vote in the house of commons.
I don't recall a vote on the Falklands.
Perhaps Tony was a more democratic leader than Maggie? What do you think?