Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
Are the Conservatives scaremongering?
More than 60 economists sign two open letters backing the chancellor's decision to delay spending cuts until 2011.
Yet, if you listen to the Conservatives and their supporters, we are in deep trouble.
Gordon Brown says...
// (Conservatives) use "legitimate concerns about deficits to scare people into accepting a bleak and austere" future. //
http://news.bbc.co.uk..._politics/8523004.stm
Is he right?
Yet, if you listen to the Conservatives and their supporters, we are in deep trouble.
Gordon Brown says...
// (Conservatives) use "legitimate concerns about deficits to scare people into accepting a bleak and austere" future. //
http://news.bbc.co.uk..._politics/8523004.stm
Is he right?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.So geezer if you found yourself suddenly with a half a million quids worth of debt would you
a) try to pay it off by making economies like buying cheaper food
b) try to get a high paying job that would allow you to pay it back
We cannot save our way out of this
We have to get more people working generating wealth to do it
That is why sudden cost cutting which would plunge us back into recession would be suicidal
Nobody in any party is suggesting tax rises and cuts aren't necessary - it's just the Tories seem reckless in when to make them
a) try to pay it off by making economies like buying cheaper food
b) try to get a high paying job that would allow you to pay it back
We cannot save our way out of this
We have to get more people working generating wealth to do it
That is why sudden cost cutting which would plunge us back into recession would be suicidal
Nobody in any party is suggesting tax rises and cuts aren't necessary - it's just the Tories seem reckless in when to make them
"We have to get more people working generating wealth to do it "
I couldn't agree more jake. Unfortunately jobs in the public sector hundreds of thousands of them add nothing to the party. OK so they get wages and we get tax back so for each pound we spend we get a bit back but otherwise they produce nothing.
Now we need to cut the public sector as small as possible and encourage private sector investment.
The private sector creates wealth, the public sector spends it and wastes a lot of it. Since 1997 there have been approx 600,000 new jobs in the public sector, most of them incomprehensable to normal people. Jobs pages of The Guardian are full of them, probably are even now.
Ok they go on the dole I here you say. Right we cut benefits to subsistance levels and encourage people to get proper jobs in the private sector that we are encouraging to flourish.
I couldn't agree more jake. Unfortunately jobs in the public sector hundreds of thousands of them add nothing to the party. OK so they get wages and we get tax back so for each pound we spend we get a bit back but otherwise they produce nothing.
Now we need to cut the public sector as small as possible and encourage private sector investment.
The private sector creates wealth, the public sector spends it and wastes a lot of it. Since 1997 there have been approx 600,000 new jobs in the public sector, most of them incomprehensable to normal people. Jobs pages of The Guardian are full of them, probably are even now.
Ok they go on the dole I here you say. Right we cut benefits to subsistance levels and encourage people to get proper jobs in the private sector that we are encouraging to flourish.
jake....I cannot answer the question, cuts now or cuts later and I am glad that I don't have to make that decision that either Government will have to make. BUT:
To use your simile.
If I was "half a million quid in debt" I would have to ask myself how I got into that state and secondly neither of your alternatives would get me back onto to solvency.
To use your simile.
If I was "half a million quid in debt" I would have to ask myself how I got into that state and secondly neither of your alternatives would get me back onto to solvency.
Labour "only" borrowed another 4.3 BILLION in January (a month when governments dont usually need to borrow).
Unfortunately over 10 years ago we trusted this country to a group of people who had no idea how to "manage" the economy (nothing new for labour there then) and they have managed to drag our economy down th the level of Greece.
If any of us looked after our finances like Labour have looked after this countrys we would have had our car repossed, our credit cards taken away, and been thrown out of our house.
Unfortunately over 10 years ago we trusted this country to a group of people who had no idea how to "manage" the economy (nothing new for labour there then) and they have managed to drag our economy down th the level of Greece.
If any of us looked after our finances like Labour have looked after this countrys we would have had our car repossed, our credit cards taken away, and been thrown out of our house.
The above are very valid arguments on both sides - clearly passionately held.
I'd have thought the simple explanation for holding back has more to do with the Conservative's Party's sheer ability to keep pointing out the country is in deep financial trouble and something ought to be done now. It is a situation that they can genuinely say they aren't responsible for, and thus it forms one of the key prongs to a strategy of persuading some voters which way to vote.
What's more interesting is that neither side are actually doing anything about it (except talking about it), and won't until after the election. The Conservatives can't do anything about it (not in power - yet), the governing party could do something about it but won't - (might lose even more votes).
Bring on the election PDQ.
I'd have thought the simple explanation for holding back has more to do with the Conservative's Party's sheer ability to keep pointing out the country is in deep financial trouble and something ought to be done now. It is a situation that they can genuinely say they aren't responsible for, and thus it forms one of the key prongs to a strategy of persuading some voters which way to vote.
What's more interesting is that neither side are actually doing anything about it (except talking about it), and won't until after the election. The Conservatives can't do anything about it (not in power - yet), the governing party could do something about it but won't - (might lose even more votes).
Bring on the election PDQ.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.