Donate SIGN UP

Good job he didn't call them 'Savages'

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 11:38 Sat 15th May 2010 | News
9 Answers
http://www.express.co...thedral-vandals-scum-

A Magistrate called them “absolute scum” in court, and A female court clerk stood up and objected. And the mother of one of the boys claims she will make an ­official complaint.

I ask you, for once the Bench got it about right, but there is always some who will object. These two yobs are 16 why can't they be named and shamed?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 9 of 9rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
another example of the inadequate and terrible parenting we see a lot of today...the belief that their darling kids can do no wrong and the refusal to punish them, and instead, close ranks and rear up in anger against anyone who does.
its a shame that many, lets face illeducated and dimwitted people, believe that to properly 'protect' and bring up their children correctly means shielding them at all costs from perceived 'attacks'...no matter who its comes from or why...
They cannot be named (and even if they were I doubt it would shame them) because the law does not allow it. Youths under 18 are afforded anonymity in court proceedings unless exceptional circumstances prevail. Unfortunately these circumstances are in no way exceptional.
Why would he call them savages? I thought that term was exclusively used by dailymailers when describing black criminals?

So confusing.
'A Magistrate called them 'absolute scum' in court ...'

No he did not. What he said was 'Normal people would consider you absolute scum ...' so it is not necessarily the Magistrate's personal opinion being offered.

That said, it is not the Magistrate's function to provide a voice for what may or may not be the opinion of the population at large, that is the job of the media, who have performed withint their remit on this occasion - even if the Magistrate exceeded his own.

Not like you only to see and interperate what fits your attitude and run with it AOG - accurate or not ... or is it?
How succint Andy -bravo !!!

Well AOG -right to reply (awaiting with baited breath).
-- answer removed --
That's disgraceful - the magistrate felt he was representing the voice of the general public (whether or not he should actually have voiced it). If this appeal or object is upheld, in view of what these boys were found guilty of, the world has indeed gone mad.
LucyThomas7

You don't know the history of AOG and the term 'savages'.

If you did, then you'd get my post.

Not your fault at all.
-- answer removed --

1 to 9 of 9rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Good job he didn't call them 'Savages'

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.