Donate SIGN UP

Why can't we send sh1tbags like this home?

Avatar Image
R1Geezer | 13:42 Tue 18th May 2010 | News
41 Answers
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8688501.stm
What other country in the world would believe all this h0rshite? Why do we care what happens to the lowlives once we've got sh0t anyway? Come on knit me some Yoghurt!
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 41rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by R1Geezer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
it's the swear filter SS, it's hilarious at times
"I bet your assumption will reduce the sales number of the Daily Mail by thousands."

AOG ... I can't believe that the Mail still sells "thousands".

Just a handful of copies nowadays, I should think.
These individuals are not British subjects and have no right of abode in the UK. The government of the UK (via our Security Service) have reasonable cause to suspect that they are engaged or were preparing to engage in acts of terrorism against our country. They are subjects of Pakistan - so why oh why are they liable to torture or death on their return to Pakistan ? Not really our concern just deport them
ok, so they are not convicted Sandy, but obviously a threat to our security and why would they face death in Pakistan?
Geezer It's a Tory Home Secretary that is refusing to Appeal against this Awful decision, Innit ?
Question Author
stop being pratt Brionon, it was a special immigration court. Look if you are going to blame owt on the Tories let them wipe their feet first, we'll take years to clear up the sh1te left by your Noo Labour mates.
I already posted this question and "link" 4 questions below this one.
joggerjayne

Do a little research before continuing to make a fool of yourself. These are the readership figures for the top ten most popular newspapers.

The Sun..................3,273,116

Daily Mail.............. 2,426,533

Daily Mirror........... 1,719,743

Daily Star...............854,480

Daily Express....... 948,375

The Daily Telegraph..... 907,329

The Times..................... 679,190

The Financial Times**. 419,386

The Guardian........ 366,645

Independent...........263,595
"stop being pratt Brionon, it was a special immigration court. Look if you are going to blame owt on the Tories let them wipe their feet first, we'll take years to clear up the sh1te left by your Noo Labour mates"

R1Geezer - the link you posted did say 'The Home Secretary, Theresa May, said she would not be appealing against the ruling, handed down by the Special Immigration Appeals Commission'...

Nice to see the Tories doing another U-turn on their manifesto promises...
"special immigration court" we know whats special about it now , they let scum stay here that have made it quite clear how much they hate it here.
Question Author
yes she did not appeal in s case that has been going on mostly before she was in office. if she had all you lot would have been moaning about interferance.
If we are powerless to extradite them once they have reached the courts then why bother going through the loops. At the first suggestion of being involved in terrorism ship them back home pronto. The reason could be they are just undersirables.
Just after hearing this on the news again...and it's actually really getting to me!

"They didn't want to send him home because he feared he'd be tortured"

Eh and what the hell did they think he was plotting to do in England????
He didn't give a sh*t about the people he would have killed or tortured!
I know in a previous post I said:

"What baffles me is that they were probably willing to be suicide bombers thus resulting in their own deaths yet they are afraid of returning home because they face death!!!!What The Funicular"

so how can the law and judges not see this????
How can people have such empathy for someone who was plotting terrorist attacks!!?
Why are they allowed stay in the country? Why are they given such compassion and consideration when they were in no way plotting to be considerate and compassionate by plotting terrorist attacks?
Anyone else really infuriated about this??
My missus says take them out to the middle of the Atlantic on a rust bucket and then pull the plug
FBG40
I just can't understand the compassion for someone so evil!!
Surely the point is sandie if they are as innocent as they claim why do they claim they face torture if they return home ? For that matter why should our courts accept their word that they would be in danger ?
Thousands of Asians travel to and from their homelands every year and they don't face any danger . So why would these suspects be any different.
Well said Modeller!
The questions you asked make so much sense!!
I'm sorry if my post above annoyed anyone, generally I don't get so angry but this has made me angry.
Who would shed a tear if he were made to "disappear" here?
According to the report he's an Al Qaeda leader, IMO the words 'terrorist' (along with murderer, paedophile and rapist) and 'human rights' don't belong in the same sentence, so why are we continually soft with these people?

The human rights act is an ass, Shami Chakrabati and her band of do-gooders have a lot to answer for
Joeluke, Who's Shami Chakrabati?
Sorry, just haven't heard of her

21 to 40 of 41rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Why can't we send sh1tbags like this home?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.