You're quite laughable, really, Anotheoldgit. First you get my name wrong and later right, then you say - TWICE - that I have asked only about 50 questions and not many of them are news-related. Do you actually bother to check through what you've written at any time?
And do you imagine that simply asking endless questions is somehow worthy? Only you would believe that my lack of questions implies a lack of knowledge about the news or the News Category here itself...I've been reading it for years longer than you have!
The fact appears to be that you check the Mail to see what it is you are supposed to be angry about each day, then - duly and dutifully - get angry about it!
Of course one has to use the media to discover what is in the news, but your big mistake is your belief that the Mail is actually a NEWSpaper. Try checking how many of the TRUE newspapers give the same prominence to the Mail's key story on any given day. Five minutes ago, for example, the Mail's online home-page highlighted a "barbaric" black man (obviously) who has raped a woman, whilst the Times stresses the impact on world markets of the euro bailout.
Now, which of these is actually important NEWS and which plays to the Mail reader's inbuilt prejudices? (I do not intend to belittle the rape-victim's suffering here, but it is of small importance in world or even national terms.)
To return to the point here...
Re your words about Zeuhl, you are someone who clearly hates...odious actually means "worthy of hatred"...another AB user. You then explain how you wish him to be, in effect, buried alive. That sounds pretty likely to produce death to me. Yet you create this thread, decrying the fact that others "hate" YOU and wish YOU "dead" What's sauce for the goose (you) most assuredly isn't sauce for the gander (anyone else) in your book, is it? Pathetic!