should this girl..............

[my4ds]

be named ?

she has ruined 2 lives.so why should she be allowed to stay invisable and a danger to other men.?

http://www.dailymail....does-say-herself.html

[IggyB]

anonymity for both would be best in the future

If they publish her details now what would stop all the real rapists attacking her safe in the knowledge that she'll not be believed if she tries to tell anyone.

[my4ds]

good point Iggy.

[joeluke]

Name her, why should she keep her anonimity after what she's done....she ruined 2 mens lives and one of them committed suicide

Mud sticks and men falsely accused of rape but found not guilty will forever have the finger pointed at them as rapists, whereas their lying accuser is free to get on with her life

If she was named then men would know her and what she'd done and would steer clear of having sex with her for fear of falsely getting accused of rape

Also women like her make it more difficult for genuine rape victims to be believed

[ummmm]

I think she should be named.

[jackthehat]

As the two men in this case have been named, I think she ought to be named.

Hopefully, in future, neither the accused nor the victim will be named.

[horselady]

I think she should be named. It must be horrendous for a man to be falsley accused of rape, the man's name should not be revealed unless he is found guilty.

[Lindylou]

Of course she should be named. She has done incredible damage to genuine rape victims. This is why the police are so wary of pursuing / believing rape accusations. And those poor, innocent men?! What must their families be going through? A friend of mine's son was accused of rape. Enormous headlines in our local paper. And when he was totally acquitted a few months later the fact was reported in two lines (two lines!) on the tenth page, under advertisments for cheap car tyres. Its time something was done about this inequality. Men can be victims too.