ChatterBank0 min ago
Why Do We Have To Have Our Religious Views !
30 Answers
Why Do we have to have our relgious views challenged by Jehovah's Witnesses and Mormons calling at our doors! Surely Religion is a personal thing and should not be infiltrated! A Wheelchair bound Jehovah was trying to drum up business yesterday in a busy shopping town, he didn't have many takers! how pathetic!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by oscarina. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
you don't have to. I never have. When preachers come to my door, I just smile and say I don't want to discuss it. I've never met one who insisted. I don't know why other people have such difficulties. But I'm also fine with letting them seek converts, in wheelchairs or otherwise. It's a free country.
"Surely religion is a personal thing"
Hmm - that's worth thinking about - most religious leaders preached to large numbers of people and they encouraged their followers to convert others.
You can see why from their perspective - If you knew something that was free and easy and brought great rewards and happiness to anybody who knew about it would you keep it to yourself.
Just that others don't see it that way.
JW's are a special case of course they are meant to preach in public as part of their end of the world cult - er sorry - religion
Religion certainly wasn't a personal thing for most of humal history - not conforming to the prevalent religion could get you seriously dead. Even in this country a couple of hundred years ago Catholics athiests and disenters were seriously persecuted.
An athiest MP was briefly imprisoned in parliament for refusing to swear an oath on the bible upon joining Westminster.
Now I guess it's becoming a personal thing because we're all too familliar with the trouble and violence it can cause so we don't discuss religion and politics in polite circles.
Hmm - that's worth thinking about - most religious leaders preached to large numbers of people and they encouraged their followers to convert others.
You can see why from their perspective - If you knew something that was free and easy and brought great rewards and happiness to anybody who knew about it would you keep it to yourself.
Just that others don't see it that way.
JW's are a special case of course they are meant to preach in public as part of their end of the world cult - er sorry - religion
Religion certainly wasn't a personal thing for most of humal history - not conforming to the prevalent religion could get you seriously dead. Even in this country a couple of hundred years ago Catholics athiests and disenters were seriously persecuted.
An athiest MP was briefly imprisoned in parliament for refusing to swear an oath on the bible upon joining Westminster.
Now I guess it's becoming a personal thing because we're all too familliar with the trouble and violence it can cause so we don't discuss religion and politics in polite circles.
As Francis says, it's part of the remit of many religions to 'spread the word'. You say religion is a personal thing, but if you really think about it, it isn't. It affects everyone - whether they want it to or not.
I had a couple of Jehovah's Witnesses on my doorstep a few weeks ago, and was in the mood to challenge them. Fortunately they were carrying a bible, and so without bringing mine to the door, I was able to show them much that they were unaware of. They went away still clinging to their fanciful beliefs and in complete denial of the evidence - as usual. I hope I gave them something to think about though. After all, if they feel at liberty to 'spread the word', I can't see why the rest of us shouldn't.
I had a couple of Jehovah's Witnesses on my doorstep a few weeks ago, and was in the mood to challenge them. Fortunately they were carrying a bible, and so without bringing mine to the door, I was able to show them much that they were unaware of. They went away still clinging to their fanciful beliefs and in complete denial of the evidence - as usual. I hope I gave them something to think about though. After all, if they feel at liberty to 'spread the word', I can't see why the rest of us shouldn't.
I used to smile politely at JWs and tell them kindly that they'd be wasting their precious time with me because I'm an atheist. But they seemed to take this as some sort of a challenge, an invitation to start a doorstep conversion.
So now I just look all distracted, look at my watch and say "Oh dear, I'd normally invite you in, give you a couple of large gins and tell you where you're going wrong with all that nonsense of yours. But so sorry, just haven't got time at the moment. Perhaps some other time. Goodbye."
Or perhaps I should try "Sorry, but I don't talk to people who would rather let a child die than give it the blood it needs. Shove off."
So now I just look all distracted, look at my watch and say "Oh dear, I'd normally invite you in, give you a couple of large gins and tell you where you're going wrong with all that nonsense of yours. But so sorry, just haven't got time at the moment. Perhaps some other time. Goodbye."
Or perhaps I should try "Sorry, but I don't talk to people who would rather let a child die than give it the blood it needs. Shove off."