Crosswords1 min ago
Is this at all surprising?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-11175850
With the systematic demonisation of men is it any wonder that they don't want to get anywhere near children?
With the systematic demonisation of men is it any wonder that they don't want to get anywhere near children?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by R1Geezer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.even when i was at primary school (well first and middle school as it was called then) there was only 1 male teacher in both schools (from 5-11 yo)
as far as i can recall, 31 years ago men had not been "systematically demonised" and anyone who had no direct experience had not even heard of sexual abuse etc, so i can see no link really. I just think it's a job that attracts more women, full stop. Similar to nursing - a job that attracts more women. patients are vulnerable too, but no-one would suggest there's not as many male nurses as female because they've been systematically demonised, would they?
as far as i can recall, 31 years ago men had not been "systematically demonised" and anyone who had no direct experience had not even heard of sexual abuse etc, so i can see no link really. I just think it's a job that attracts more women, full stop. Similar to nursing - a job that attracts more women. patients are vulnerable too, but no-one would suggest there's not as many male nurses as female because they've been systematically demonised, would they?
I have been very much immersed in this as I occasionally work in schools and this situation is very real I'm afraid. There *is* a lack of male teachers, hugging a crying child is considered a no no for male teachers. Innocent men are being looked at askance in all sorts of situations and occasionally wrongly suspected - it's a side effect of the paedo hysteria that (even thinking) people buy into and it makes me livid.
We live in sick sad times...I hope it moves on.
We live in sick sad times...I hope it moves on.
My dad started teaching in 1972 and even then it was very rare for there to be male teachers in primary schools. As for them 'being scared to hug a crying child', I work for the local authority and a lot of my work involves children and no one under any circumstances is allowed to touch the children at all. This is part of the child protection policy and is as much for our protection as their's - to safeguard against false allegations etc. I think it's ridiculous, but it affects everyone, not just men.
A lot of men become primary teachers as they seem to be more likely to become Head teachers than women (don't know the exact percentages but its something like 90% of all primary teachers are women but 90% of all primary Head teachers are men). It's the very reason why my husband chose to teach in primary schools.
It seems that the die is cast now for male teachers nowadays. It it such a shame that they can't get on with the business of teaching without being the object of suspicion. We had some great teachers in our middle school and no-one gave a thought to things like that. Nowadays it must be difficult for men to teach at all, when up against volatile 13-15 year old boys that must be very hard to deal with,
Factor - your suspicions about this poster are PRECISELY my definition of the word "troll". I wish posters here would grasp this fact.
My point being that the word seems to have become a generic term for anyone (perhaps a previously banned poster) who comes on here just to be silly (not the true definition).
My point being that the word seems to have become a generic term for anyone (perhaps a previously banned poster) who comes on here just to be silly (not the true definition).
RIG, how many male teachers did you have teaching at your primary school (s) ?
Back in 1952, when I started school, it was unthinkable for a man to be teaching primary school children. My state school had 100 per cent female teaching staff ,as did the private school I attended later. Nobody was thinking of paedophilia.The job was simply seen as not one for men .Even in these egalitarian times, this attitude prevails. Almost needless to say,both the schools had male headmasters but neither of them taught the children. They were administrators, not teachers.
Incidentally,the private school insisted that the female teachers be addressed by pupils as 'Sir' not 'Miss'. I don't know what to make of that!.
Back in 1952, when I started school, it was unthinkable for a man to be teaching primary school children. My state school had 100 per cent female teaching staff ,as did the private school I attended later. Nobody was thinking of paedophilia.The job was simply seen as not one for men .Even in these egalitarian times, this attitude prevails. Almost needless to say,both the schools had male headmasters but neither of them taught the children. They were administrators, not teachers.
Incidentally,the private school insisted that the female teachers be addressed by pupils as 'Sir' not 'Miss'. I don't know what to make of that!.