News2 mins ago
So life can mean life then...
http://news.sky.com/s...ostitutes_In_Bradford
Why don't M'Luds do this more often?
Why don't M'Luds do this more often?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by R1Geezer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Of course it can
How many times have I explained the full life tarriff and postedthe link to people serving one:
http://en.wikipedia.o...ers_with_life_tariffs
Crimes where whole life order are recommended
* murder of two or more persons, where each murder involves any of the following :
o a substantial degree of premeditation or planning,
o the abduction of the victim, or
o sexual or sadistic conduct,
* child murder if involving the abduction of the child or sexual or sadistic motivation,
* murder done for the purpose of advancing a political, religious or ideological cause,
* murder by an offender previously convicted of murder,
* other offence if the court considers that the seriousness of the offence (or the combination of the offence and one or more offences associated with it) is exceptionally high. For example, high treason can warrant such a sentence, if it is grave enough.
How many times have I explained the full life tarriff and postedthe link to people serving one:
http://en.wikipedia.o...ers_with_life_tariffs
Crimes where whole life order are recommended
* murder of two or more persons, where each murder involves any of the following :
o a substantial degree of premeditation or planning,
o the abduction of the victim, or
o sexual or sadistic conduct,
* child murder if involving the abduction of the child or sexual or sadistic motivation,
* murder done for the purpose of advancing a political, religious or ideological cause,
* murder by an offender previously convicted of murder,
* other offence if the court considers that the seriousness of the offence (or the combination of the offence and one or more offences associated with it) is exceptionally high. For example, high treason can warrant such a sentence, if it is grave enough.
-- answer removed --
http://tinyurl.com/2dt3g8w
I don't think your Sky News report, tells the full story of these despicable, savage and vicious crimes.
Last week we saw a woman sectioned under the Mental Health Act and is in a secure unit for the murder and mutilation of her 4 year old daughter, and some felt sorry for her because of her mental condition.
http://www.theanswerb...s/Question969059.html
Will these same people now show this creature pity?
Because he must be mental to have done what he did.
I don't think your Sky News report, tells the full story of these despicable, savage and vicious crimes.
Last week we saw a woman sectioned under the Mental Health Act and is in a secure unit for the murder and mutilation of her 4 year old daughter, and some felt sorry for her because of her mental condition.
http://www.theanswerb...s/Question969059.html
Will these same people now show this creature pity?
Because he must be mental to have done what he did.
Oh dear, how some people divert away from the subject under discussion.
Why did the report have to say the victim was a prostitute?
Why do they say the victim was a student on her year out, back packing in Australia?
Why do they say the victim was Asian and he was attacked in his corner shop?
Why do they say he was a school boy on his way to school?
Why do they say the lady who was knocked down, was a 'Lolly Pop Lady'?
Etc, Etc. Etc.
It's called descriptive reporting, nothing more sinister
Why did the report have to say the victim was a prostitute?
Why do they say the victim was a student on her year out, back packing in Australia?
Why do they say the victim was Asian and he was attacked in his corner shop?
Why do they say he was a school boy on his way to school?
Why do they say the lady who was knocked down, was a 'Lolly Pop Lady'?
Etc, Etc. Etc.
It's called descriptive reporting, nothing more sinister
A different sort of madness??????
That's a new one on me.
If she was mad, she perhaps would not even realise it was a child, never mind her own, she could have thought it was the Teddy she never had as a child, but had managed to acquire another child's Teddy, and didn't want her to have it back.
No madness is madness.
That's a new one on me.
If she was mad, she perhaps would not even realise it was a child, never mind her own, she could have thought it was the Teddy she never had as a child, but had managed to acquire another child's Teddy, and didn't want her to have it back.
No madness is madness.
"Yes, granted whilst most of the women he murdered were just that, not all of them were"
Actually, all of the 'Canonical Five' were prostitutes. There's some debate over whether Jack killed more or less than the five usually listed, and of the other murders possibly committed by the same killer some of them weren't prostitutes (though most were). The
And yes, the reporting of their profession would've been highly relevant. The prevalence of prostitutes at the time meant that they were all at risk and needed to be publicly identified as the area most at risk.
Sorry, serial killers are an area I'm a little bit nerdy/obsessive about and the Ripper case is one I know a fair bit on which I rarely get a chance to shoot my mouth off about. Carry on.
Actually, all of the 'Canonical Five' were prostitutes. There's some debate over whether Jack killed more or less than the five usually listed, and of the other murders possibly committed by the same killer some of them weren't prostitutes (though most were). The
And yes, the reporting of their profession would've been highly relevant. The prevalence of prostitutes at the time meant that they were all at risk and needed to be publicly identified as the area most at risk.
Sorry, serial killers are an area I'm a little bit nerdy/obsessive about and the Ripper case is one I know a fair bit on which I rarely get a chance to shoot my mouth off about. Carry on.