ChatterBank1 min ago
Just another mad-cap idea?
28 Answers
http://tinyurl.com/63motjd
Yet another mad-cap idea, does anyone really think that putting cigarettes in plain packets will encourage people to give up smoking?
How will the smokers know what brand he/she is smoking?
All these pointless measures must be costing just as much as the Government gains in taxation.
Why don't they grab the bull by it's horns and make smoking illegal?
Yet another mad-cap idea, does anyone really think that putting cigarettes in plain packets will encourage people to give up smoking?
How will the smokers know what brand he/she is smoking?
All these pointless measures must be costing just as much as the Government gains in taxation.
Why don't they grab the bull by it's horns and make smoking illegal?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Revenue (direct and indirect) from smoking pulls in about 10 billion a year.
Smoking related diseases cost the NHS around 5 Billion a year.
Therefore smoker are still subsidising non-smokers.
And, no-one has ever bothered to work out, the actual gains (or losses) if those smoking related diseases did not occur. For example many of those smokers would live longer placing additional burdens on the state (within in and without the NHS). And of course, some would go on to contract other age-related illnesses, which impose further burdens on the NHS).
I understand why people get agitated on both sides of the smoking argument, but that's no excuse for just making up figures to suit your arguments.
Smoking related diseases cost the NHS around 5 Billion a year.
Therefore smoker are still subsidising non-smokers.
And, no-one has ever bothered to work out, the actual gains (or losses) if those smoking related diseases did not occur. For example many of those smokers would live longer placing additional burdens on the state (within in and without the NHS). And of course, some would go on to contract other age-related illnesses, which impose further burdens on the NHS).
I understand why people get agitated on both sides of the smoking argument, but that's no excuse for just making up figures to suit your arguments.
mikmak - because it isnt just you 'enjoying' it is it? its everyone near you, ordinary people, being forced to suffer, just so you can enjoy yourself.
it is a deadly habit, so pardon us if we would rather you no longer 'enjoyed' yourself at our expense
live and let is a ridiculous argument because your actions do not let others just live, they shorten the life of yourself and others near you
if the habit was harmful only to the smoker, id say, fill your boots
it is a deadly habit, so pardon us if we would rather you no longer 'enjoyed' yourself at our expense
live and let is a ridiculous argument because your actions do not let others just live, they shorten the life of yourself and others near you
if the habit was harmful only to the smoker, id say, fill your boots
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.