Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
less commonly confused words...
43 Answers
we all know the usual ones that are mistaken - your, you're etc - but this question is not about all those common ones - i was just thinking about the less common ones...
over the last 6 months - year, i have noticed quite a large number of people using wandering instead of wondering, and weary instead of wary...
these are not merely mispellings - they mean different things, so i wonder what the people think when they see the other word written down somewhere...? why do they think this? do they really not know both words...?
one who said weary, was my friend and i was confused by it because it changed the meaning of her comment...basically saying she was tired of someone she had only just met... but when i realised she meant and said it...she wouldnt have it at first...then accepted it... then used it again a few months later
any thoughts?
and have you noticed any less common words that get often mixed up...?
over the last 6 months - year, i have noticed quite a large number of people using wandering instead of wondering, and weary instead of wary...
these are not merely mispellings - they mean different things, so i wonder what the people think when they see the other word written down somewhere...? why do they think this? do they really not know both words...?
one who said weary, was my friend and i was confused by it because it changed the meaning of her comment...basically saying she was tired of someone she had only just met... but when i realised she meant and said it...she wouldnt have it at first...then accepted it... then used it again a few months later
any thoughts?
and have you noticed any less common words that get often mixed up...?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by joko. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.thanks all, some good ones there.
could of/ have, is a very common one though philtaz, and is grammar not confusing words... and the definitely/definately one is the same word, just a mispelling... as is difinately! ;o)
i believe that confusing them is called malapropism...after Mrs. Malaprop - a character in a play who used to do it a lot for comedy porpoises...
but the technical name is homophones
could of/ have, is a very common one though philtaz, and is grammar not confusing words... and the definitely/definately one is the same word, just a mispelling... as is difinately! ;o)
i believe that confusing them is called malapropism...after Mrs. Malaprop - a character in a play who used to do it a lot for comedy porpoises...
but the technical name is homophones
Homophones and malapropisms are two completely different creatures. A homophone is merely a word which shares the same sound though different spelling as another. A malapropism is the use of a word which vaguely sounds like the word intended, but with a different meaning. One need look no further than Hilda Ogden (pace non-Corrie fans) who proudly referred to her wall decoration as her "muriel".
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.