Is This The Final Nail In The Coffin For...
News0 min ago
No best answer has yet been selected by noxlumos. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Precisely my point vic, one man's terrorist is another man's fredom fighter.The term is so vague and so open to abuse that you could theoretically be arrested for discussing the film Michael Collins or writing a serious historical book about anything from Wat Tyler to the French resistance under Nazi rule.The whole thing a a serious breach of our freedom and yet this seems to be passing people by without them fully appreciating the devastating affect of including this one word.
It is illegal already to incite racial hate or murder, the inclusion of the word "glorification" only serves to provide the Govt with a weapon to stop all discussion about elements of society that don't agree with it should they so choose.
We already have the crimes of inciting, aiding, abetting, counselling and procuring and it is surely these thing that we wish to prevent through the use of the law in relation to any crimes involving secondary offenders not just racial motivated crimes, the addition of the word glorification will just lead to legal uncertainty until at some point the Law Lords will be called upon to interpret the word in relation to a conviction � something that will probably not be particularly easy to do were upon the word will be scaled down and in all likelihood incorporated into the present offences as glorification is so woolly as you say all sorts of things will fall into it
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.