ChatterBank23 mins ago
guardian prize
4 Answers
I thought todays offering by Auracaria was very easily cracked and not very taxing (not because I am getting better!) but is it that dear old Auracaria is maybe losing some of his cunning?
What do you experts out there think. I have seen very few postings today asking for help??
What do you experts out there think. I have seen very few postings today asking for help??
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by macgee. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I couldn't disagree more. There is an obvious risk with one of the Master's epic anagrams that - once cracked - it provides a lot of crossing letters for the remaining clues. But the quality of this Aracauriagram was up to his highest standard. 34 letters, all drawn from a phrase that was a pretty good summary of the source work. (For those who haven't seen the puzzle the answer was the last couplet from Milton's "Lycidas", a poem of mourning for the death of a friend.) And the misdirection of the definition part "A Sherpherd's Farewell" was classic stuff too. A perfectly fair definition - the quotation is the parting words of an imagined shepherd - but, of course, it points you unerringly towards the famous chorale from L'Enfance du Christ by Berlioz; entirely the wrong way!
Along with that there was plenty of his cheeky humour - or should that be humorous cheek? If I can solve crosswords of this standard at his age - much less set them! - I'll be a happy man.
Along with that there was plenty of his cheeky humour - or should that be humorous cheek? If I can solve crosswords of this standard at his age - much less set them! - I'll be a happy man.
Thanks for your observation Jack and I cetainly dont disagree with the solution to 9across explanation. However surely the point of a good crossword is that is a 'free standing' puzzle that should be able to be solved without 'google ' or other such references e.g. sitting on a train. This was that sort of puzzle and that particular solution was not at all difficult once a few letters were in and the anagram sorted. I have never heard of the Berlioz work anyway. My point was that the great man is known as such for his cunning (and humour) , fairness and above all assumption that the solver has the cunning to unravel his thinking. All I felt on this crossword was that wasnt really there. I did it in under than 30 minutes. Most of his work from a couple of years back were a good couple of hours etc. It could of course be that I am getting more tuned to his thinking but that would be pretentious of me!
I still feel that he is probably the best around but I think an edge is starting to be lost.
Long may he be around.
I still feel that he is probably the best around but I think an edge is starting to be lost.
Long may he be around.