Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
Listener 4222 - 27 By Mango
67 Answers
A very entertaining puzzle which I couldn't put down: a nicely cryptic preamble, some tricky (but fair) clues, an excellent grid and an endgame which had me beaming. The general theme became apparent fairly early on, but pennies dropped until and after the grid was filled.
I have doubts about the precise appearance of the final grid but things will probably resolve themselves when I'm awake.
A great puzzle with which to end the Listener year. Thank you, Mango.
I have doubts about the precise appearance of the final grid but things will probably resolve themselves when I'm awake.
A great puzzle with which to end the Listener year. Thank you, Mango.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Texasetes. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I'm in the same position as the rest of you. In principle I can see what I have to do, but the instructions are so vague I'm not at all sure how to represent these actions in the final grid.
Such a pity. What might have been a cracking puzzle so cloaked in ambiguity that it can only be finished to the satisfaction of the setter by guessing what the setter really wants. Not for me. Sorry.
Such a pity. What might have been a cracking puzzle so cloaked in ambiguity that it can only be finished to the satisfaction of the setter by guessing what the setter really wants. Not for me. Sorry.
Finally finished grid after a bit of difficulty with the oedipal pair. I found these clues quite tricky, but I think I understand what to do now. I thought it was going to be even more clever when I saw how the first juncture related to the thematic item, but I don't think it can be all like that for obvious reasons. Oh well, back to the cooking and cleaning for family arriving this evening via Dens Park - another NE hint?
Thouroughly enjoyed this. Started at a canter but then significantly held up as clues seemed to become more difficult as moved towards the middle. Think I have the end game resolved - the fact that all of the shaded cells have been called into play gives me some confidence. Thanks to Mango for another enjoyable puzzle.
Yes. Tilbee, I had the same experience: rapid progress yesterday in the upper and lower thirds and then stuck most of today in the middle, but it's gradually filling in. Got the 27 theme early on but not yet clear what to do with the shaded cells. I confess I don't understand the wordplay for some of the clues I've answered.
This has been a year of coin-flips. Should upside-down letters look more like the letter which they have to become, or more like the original letter only upside-down? Should a letter remain capitalised, or should it be entered in lower case to resemble a Russian letter? There have been other examples as well and it's been personally very disappointing to have made the wrong choice in every single instance this year.
Now we have the latest puzzle and I agree that the choices are much clearer this time. If you look at the instruction derived from the down clues and note the use of the word "disappearing" in the rubric, it is very clear that there should be no vestige of these thematic objects remaining in the final grid. By analogy there should only be one remaining of the other type of thematic object, even though this means you must draw a circle around its now empty starting cell and another around its final resting place.
All of this is as clear as daylight to me - clear, but I suspect not what the setter intends, for now we have a grid with a lot of spaced cells and it would be possible to have a correct grid even if the solver had not solved all the clues correctly.
Thie instructions could equally be interpreted in an entirely different way which I cannot explain further without giving the game away which is not something I'd ever want to do.
After much deliberation I have decided to submit my grid with no alterations whatsoever, bar the two encirclings demanded by the rubric. This is based more on the difficulty the setter would have had expressing the instructions unequivocally, than what has actually been written.
But, hey, it's only a guess! Given my track record this year, I would strongly advise advise anyone who is all correct so far this year not to follow my example.
Now we have the latest puzzle and I agree that the choices are much clearer this time. If you look at the instruction derived from the down clues and note the use of the word "disappearing" in the rubric, it is very clear that there should be no vestige of these thematic objects remaining in the final grid. By analogy there should only be one remaining of the other type of thematic object, even though this means you must draw a circle around its now empty starting cell and another around its final resting place.
All of this is as clear as daylight to me - clear, but I suspect not what the setter intends, for now we have a grid with a lot of spaced cells and it would be possible to have a correct grid even if the solver had not solved all the clues correctly.
Thie instructions could equally be interpreted in an entirely different way which I cannot explain further without giving the game away which is not something I'd ever want to do.
After much deliberation I have decided to submit my grid with no alterations whatsoever, bar the two encirclings demanded by the rubric. This is based more on the difficulty the setter would have had expressing the instructions unequivocally, than what has actually been written.
But, hey, it's only a guess! Given my track record this year, I would strongly advise advise anyone who is all correct so far this year not to follow my example.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.