ChatterBank4 mins ago
Can Abao Naysayers Officially Stop Whinning Now?
27 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ sport/0 /olympi cs/2343 4844
Should this, coupled with the news that we are 12bn up indirectly, put this one to bed?
Should this, coupled with the news that we are 12bn up indirectly, put this one to bed?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.i had my doubts, primarily because of the cost and also the amount of people coming, not to mention those who predicted traffic chaos. It wasn't like it, having attended the Paralympics it was a wonderful day.
I would say though i don't see the real legacy that this is supposed to have been for the people of London, and more importantly for the people who live near the Olympic park
I would say though i don't see the real legacy that this is supposed to have been for the people of London, and more importantly for the people who live near the Olympic park
the Olympics were mostly great. But it shouldn't be forgotten that the booking procedure was rubbish, with constant computer crashes (mind you, that was the only way I got a ticket), and the G4S security plan was a disaster - they should never be allowed near a public contract again. The actual athletics were fine, though.
give the legacy time, emmie, nobody ever said it could be instant, but the first homes are opening
http:// www.sta ndard.c o.uk/ne ws/lond on/firs t-of-30 000-oly mpic-pa rk-resi dents-m ove-in- next-mo nth-873 3271.ht ml
http://
they shouldn't be using the armed forces to to the security for a sporting event. That contract with GS4 for a shed load of money should have been water tight, i think there was some grievances on both sides, the management of GS4 underestimating numbers and the Olympic committee not getting their remit right... still it was a great games. The Queen Elizabeth Olympic park stadium is stunning, and if West Ham are going there, then they are blessed.
oh, they get by somehow, TTT
http:// www.gua rdian.c o.uk/bu siness/ 2013/ju l/11/g4 s-inves tigated -overch arging- million s-pound s
Must be their high-quality staff
http:// www.huf fington post.co .uk/201 3/07/25 /g4s-wo rker-da vid-bea dnell-g areth-m yatt_n_ 3652962 .html
or their rigorous systems
http:// www.gua rdian.c o.uk/bu siness/ 2013/ju l/21/g4 s-contr actor-f ailures -evicti on-clai ms
http://
Must be their high-quality staff
http://
or their rigorous systems
http://
Without getting too bogged down in the detail (which in some respect is very debateable) it just strikes me that virtually every Olympiad since the War - and particularly those in more recent times - has left the host city with enormous debts. The UK, however (not particularly adept at getting value for what, in this case, is predominantly taxpayers' money) manages to turn in 130% profit in just a year. I think these numbers may well be "subject to revision" in the fullness of time.
I don't know about debt, NJ - Montreal certainly did, but I think since the LA games contros have been reasonably stringent. The main problem seems to be what to do with the leftover stadia - even Sydney's isn't getting much use, I'm told - but London's seem to be being disposed of pretty much according to plan.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.