ChatterBank0 min ago
Listener 4272 - Bun Fight By Kea
53 Answers
Thanks for a good challenge, Kea. It was a nice challenge to determine the answers that had extra letters and not easy to get the two items from the extra letters.
I am a bit concerned about what I feel is ambiguity in the instruction. Are we supposed to write beneath the grid:
a) The word (obtained from the unused extra letters) that describes the goings-on
or
b) The goings-on itself.
The GOINGS-ON: label would suggest b) but I fear it's a) to prove we got that word...
I am a bit concerned about what I feel is ambiguity in the instruction. Are we supposed to write beneath the grid:
a) The word (obtained from the unused extra letters) that describes the goings-on
or
b) The goings-on itself.
The GOINGS-ON: label would suggest b) but I fear it's a) to prove we got that word...
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by TheBear69. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.19 non-words is accurate.
I am still debating the merits of the descriptor vs the thing described. Not only is there the GOINGS-ON label, but the subordinate clause "which must be written below the grid" is closer to "goings-on" so that interpretation is better grammatically. Also, there is indirect proof that one has the correct descriptor in how one resolves an otherwise ambiguous entry.
I am still debating the merits of the descriptor vs the thing described. Not only is there the GOINGS-ON label, but the subordinate clause "which must be written below the grid" is closer to "goings-on" so that interpretation is better grammatically. Also, there is indirect proof that one has the correct descriptor in how one resolves an otherwise ambiguous entry.
Greetings from a slightly drizzly Hong Kong. Copied grid out and have filled it all bar one cell, and have done all the grid maniplations without identifying any of the thematic items from the letter pairs. Will leave those for tomorrow.... Definitely a most neat construction, so many thanks to Kea. Btw, there is no FNC here.....
I calculate the number of permutations of omitted letters from the across clues as well under 100,000. I won't give an exact number nor my reasoning to reach this, since this may give too much away. However given the requirement to produce real words and the associated sequencing of vowels and consonants this soon reduces very drastically.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.