ChatterBank0 min ago
Hall Cleared Of Raping 2 More Girls
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-27441 510
Cleared of 15 charges or rape and 4 of indecent assault. But at the beginning of the trial he admitted indecently assaulting one woman when she was aged 13.
Hall's barrister said that under the law at the time the offences were alleged to have happened he would have been charged with unlawful sex with a girl under 16.
Don't understand this...if he admitted a charge, why was he not sentenced for it ?
Cleared of 15 charges or rape and 4 of indecent assault. But at the beginning of the trial he admitted indecently assaulting one woman when she was aged 13.
Hall's barrister said that under the law at the time the offences were alleged to have happened he would have been charged with unlawful sex with a girl under 16.
Don't understand this...if he admitted a charge, why was he not sentenced for it ?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Stuart Hall found guilty of indecent assault but cleared of rape... http:// gu.com/ p/3p83t /tw via @guardian
looks like at the start of this trial he admitted one assult and denied the rest. He was found guilty of one, which was an assault against the same girl he'd already admitted. They'd wait till all the charges were heard before sentencing him for any of them, since they were all brought at the same time - including the one he admitted.
This from Sky...It can now be revealed that Hall complained about his "routine" being disrupted when he was moved to a different prison during his trial.
On the first day of the trial, Mr Aylett QC, told the judge: "Since the end of July the defendant has been in Leyland prison where he has something approaching a routine. He has a cell, his library, he has his clothes there.
"Yesterday he was told he may be moved to Preston for the duration of the trial."
The judge, Mr Justice Turner, said he had no power to intervene.
As the trial progressed, Mr Aylett brought up the subject again in open court - not before the jury - as he referred to the "extraordinary amount of dismay" it had caused to his client.
On the first day of the trial, Mr Aylett QC, told the judge: "Since the end of July the defendant has been in Leyland prison where he has something approaching a routine. He has a cell, his library, he has his clothes there.
"Yesterday he was told he may be moved to Preston for the duration of the trial."
The judge, Mr Justice Turner, said he had no power to intervene.
As the trial progressed, Mr Aylett brought up the subject again in open court - not before the jury - as he referred to the "extraordinary amount of dismay" it had caused to his client.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.