Crosswords17 mins ago
Listener 4385
29 Answers
What a delightful compilation. Thank you dragon. We have really enjoyed this.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Ruthrobin. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Unlike others, I seem to have found the PD clues quite straightforward. However, it's taken over a day of pondering to come up with what I presume is required in the two 2-cell entries. I think I was thrown by the 'digitally enhanced' bit, which I've been interpreting in a variety of what I now presume to be incorrect ways. I'm still not entirely convinced.
tnap, I'm with you on this -- two cells of my grid remain empty at the moment.
As to the Printer's Devilry: I was a big fan of these when they appeared as "Special" Azed puzzles when I solved Azeds in the 1990s; in fact, we had to write a PD clue as part of the clue-writing competition entry on one occasion -- it wasn't at all easy! So respect for Dragon here in producing some excellent PD clues.
Now back to those 2 cells .................
As to the Printer's Devilry: I was a big fan of these when they appeared as "Special" Azed puzzles when I solved Azeds in the 1990s; in fact, we had to write a PD clue as part of the clue-writing competition entry on one occasion -- it wasn't at all easy! So respect for Dragon here in producing some excellent PD clues.
Now back to those 2 cells .................
Phew - that needed a few different brain cells to be engaged - the elliptical mind of the Printer's Devil is quite a thing.
All done and a nice smile when the last couple of cells were filled in the central column (keep going emcee and tnap - it is possible).
Thanks Dragon - a very unusual challenge and very enjoyable.
All done and a nice smile when the last couple of cells were filled in the central column (keep going emcee and tnap - it is possible).
Thanks Dragon - a very unusual challenge and very enjoyable.
It was a PD crossword that first enticed me into trying Listeners, a few years ago, so I was delighted to see this one. In contrast to several of you, I like clues without the “normal” wordplay/definition structure, and crosswords with weird grids. So I suppose I’m non-Ximinean? Well, I certainly attempt puzzles to be entertained; with Listeners I expect the unexpected, but not the unfair. With this puzzle there are one or two clues I would say were weaker, and quite a few I’d never have got without crossing letters, but I can’t see an unfair clue here.
Olichant - had a think about definitions in PD clues; don‘t think they are needed in this one, simply ‘cos I managed to finish before mid-week. Also, wouldn’t they make the writing of good surface meanings for before and after PD clues very unwieldy?
So roll on a nice mixture of &lits, spoonerisms, PDs, etc, all playfair encoded in base 13. Just so long as I can do some of it, and enjoy the bits I am able to do. Anyone remember the puzzle involving “knock knock” joke answers which were all Biblical names?
Thank you, Dragon. Enjoyed it.
Olichant - had a think about definitions in PD clues; don‘t think they are needed in this one, simply ‘cos I managed to finish before mid-week. Also, wouldn’t they make the writing of good surface meanings for before and after PD clues very unwieldy?
So roll on a nice mixture of &lits, spoonerisms, PDs, etc, all playfair encoded in base 13. Just so long as I can do some of it, and enjoy the bits I am able to do. Anyone remember the puzzle involving “knock knock” joke answers which were all Biblical names?
Thank you, Dragon. Enjoyed it.
Well, borealis, liking Printer's Devilry doesn't make you non-Ximinean: see
http:// www.cro ssword. org.uk/ xpdevil ry.htm.
http://
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.