ChatterBank7 mins ago
Is The Green Party Particularly Large?
12 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -politi cs-4432 9338
they always seem to need 2 leaders.
they always seem to need 2 leaders.
Answers
^ a quick scan of some of your previous "answers" ( i use the term lightly) to other questions and its pretty obvious that you are lacking in any form of identifiable intelligence ...why do you bother, you just seem to embarrass yourself... you are to this board what dianne abottopotamo us is to the labour party...
18:00 Fri 01st Jun 2018
They don't need two leaders, 3Ts, but in the 2016 election Caroline Lucas and Jonathan Bartley stood as a single joint candidate (if that makes sense) on the basis that they would job share if elected. Voters could not vote for them individually and they secured 86% of the votes. The party's constitution allows for either a single leader and two deputy leaders of two co-leaders and a single deputy.
Please don't think I have any interest whatsoever in the Green Party. God Save Us! I looked it up a couple of days ago as I was intrigued as to why they had two leaders.
Please don't think I have any interest whatsoever in the Green Party. God Save Us! I looked it up a couple of days ago as I was intrigued as to why they had two leaders.
^ a quick scan of some of your previous "answers" ( i use the term lightly) to other questions and its pretty obvious that you are lacking in any form of identifiable intelligence...why do you bother, you just seem to embarrass yourself...you are to this board what dianne abottopotamous is to the labour party...
The Green Party are a total irrelevance. I pity Brightonians that their MP is a green.
I remember in their manifesto in the GE before the last one that they stated that the highest paid employee should earn no more than the 20x the lowest paid employee. Or in other words if a bog cleaner at, say, Barclays was earning £10k, the CEO should earn a maximum of £200k. That is just completely bonkers.
Still, I suppose it doesn't matter one jot. They could promise that everybody in the land gets a free Unicorn, but as they will never have to deliver on a manifesto pledge that can promise what they like.
They are a political irrelevance.
I remember in their manifesto in the GE before the last one that they stated that the highest paid employee should earn no more than the 20x the lowest paid employee. Or in other words if a bog cleaner at, say, Barclays was earning £10k, the CEO should earn a maximum of £200k. That is just completely bonkers.
Still, I suppose it doesn't matter one jot. They could promise that everybody in the land gets a free Unicorn, but as they will never have to deliver on a manifesto pledge that can promise what they like.
They are a political irrelevance.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.