'mornin Everyone, A Civil Law Question(S)

[notnutnut]

Well, I'm still on the same case if anyone remembers it. Any clues at all with this greatly appreciated. As always, please ask if I don't include enough detail. In a civil case, at the appeal on paper stage, an L.J refuses 'permission to' one quoted reason being that 'because my counsel decided not to call me I cannot now use this as a ground of appeal' but gives permission to renew at an oral hearing. The next L.J. tells me that 'I made the conscious decision not to give my evidence at trial', surely these two quotes are at odds with each other ? My other issue in this posting (there are a few) is one that so many poor souls mention:how does one get an answer to any letter/email whatever from CLCC ? I was under the impression that I was entitled to a copy of any orders in this case being a party to it but CLCC will not respond,nor will the trial judge. One last quickie, having verified that I can have a copy of the trial audio on cd (subject to judges approval) CLCC seem to have gone 'no comment' and H.H. said he couldn't help. Since non-disclosure and vitiation of our evidence have most certainly occurred on closer examination, I thought the audio records the much more expedient method to ascertain exactly what degree of damage was done by this method. Can I force a response from them ? I'm going up RCj next week to see first hand why I can't have a copy of the orders so far given and what to do if the judge won't consent to me having the audio to prove my point.(I'm going to email him again in the morning). I really haven't told any lies in this case, or any other by proof of evidence, at all, ever. This is why I believe I was not allowed by our counsel to go in the witness box. Any ideas how to resolve this please before I book my ticket to Strasbourg ? Thanks for all your help, NNN

[EDDIE51]

I do not understand this at all,sorry.Can you post a 'time line' of what happened? I do not know what all the initials mean either RCJ,CLCC and the rest.

[Peter Pedant]

Hi 3N and hi eddie

eddie this is part of a long running saga of which this is just part
http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/Law/Civil/Question1414840.html

3N // The next L.J. tells me that 'I made the conscious decision not to give my evidence at trial', //
yup I remember that bit really well - you went in search of an injunction whilst your case was being heard, and I seem to recollect the witness who was meant to blow the case apart ( your mother or your grandmother ? ) went into the witness box and did just that .....

she blew your case completely to smithereens ( and not the other side's )


and now there are bits of the case all over the court-room you have not really been able to them together to make an appeal.

This case has taken over your life for the last few years 3N
you should cancel your ticket to Strasbourg and say to yourself philosophically " well I lost that one tho I shouldnt have "

and start about doing something else

[EDDIE51]

Well PP You HAve summed up what I was thinking.Sorry NNN but you have not the slightest inkling of court procedure . You have repeatedly shot yourself in the foot. This case is a non starter from the beginning. Just give up and get on with you life! Just one vital point, a judge CANNOT reply to emails or any communication about a case that is not made in court under oath.To do so would result in the case being thrown out.

[notnutnut]

Hello all, sorry not to get back to you sooner but I'm just back from another 'tour of duty' in legalland. EDDIE51 I'd be happy to post that if you still require ? Peter Pendant,oh, before I forget, thank you both for your input. PP, I can see I think how you've reasoned some of this but most of my posts are, although connected overall, only vaguely linked to each other. Also, in the past I've been told more than once that I confuse some people. It was I who had the evidence to sink C's fake case at CLCC in 2013, part of which would sunk certain other people too, this being the reason I'm told I cannot give my evidence and upon realising that my poor mother, without the promised hearing amplification could not possibly do any good, so, I tell our solicitors clerk (more than once) that I'm going to RCJ to seek an order that I may give my evidence. I see no other way to defend our case and what about section 6(1) where did that go. I'm various Micky mouse reasons the next day as to why I didn't give evidence, they don't even concur. My friend Olympus who was with me that day would probably this event anyway. I could post a chronology here if it didn't prejudice what I seek. I'll carry on tomorrow but does anyone know how I can expedite my being given the audio CD I request ? They should be interesting I fancy. Goodnight all.