ChatterBank1 min ago
People Smugglers Rescued From The Channel.
20 Answers
Two suspected people smugglers rescued from a sinking boat in the English Channel. Boat contained large number of life jackets. Border Force took them into custody and were bailed after questioning. Bailed I imagine means and will never be seen again. What's wrong with this country.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by patsyann. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/201 6/06/19 /two-su spected -people -smuggl ers-are -rescue d-in-th e-chann el/
Maybe they hadn't enough evidence to bring a charge?
Maybe they hadn't enough evidence to bring a charge?
The only alternative to bail is a remand in custody, that is VERY rare in crimes other than murder, manslaughter and GBH with intent.
There was no viable alternative to bail in this case as the law does not allow remand for this offence.Judges and magistrates can not make up the law as they go along, they can only go by the rules and guidelines.
There was no viable alternative to bail in this case as the law does not allow remand for this offence.Judges and magistrates can not make up the law as they go along, they can only go by the rules and guidelines.
“The only alternative to bail is a remand in custody, that is VERY rare in crimes other than murder, manslaughter and GBH with intent.”
Eddie, Eddie, I thought you knew about these things!
Magistrates and judges remand people in custody every day of the week for far less serious crimes than the ones you mention. The 1976 Bail Act governs what happens and it says, basically that everybody has the right to bail unless it can be shown that there is genuine reason to believe that they might:
(a) Abscond (i.e. fail to turn up for their next appearance)
(b) Commit further offences
(c) Interfere with the course of justice (in particular, witnesses)
Bail with conditions may be granted to allay those fears (e.g. a condition to stay away from a particular person and/or location if the problem is (c)). But if no conditions satisfy the court that the risk is sufficiently reduced then a remand in custody is appropriate. In particular remands in custody are frequently used for cases of assault committed as Domestic Violence, where it is feared that the accused, if released, may “persuade” the victim to “change her mind”.
There is insufficient detail to say why the court was satisfied that these people should be granted bail. The fact that they may have no UK address (and we don’t know if that is the case) is not, by itself, a reason to refuse bail.
Eddie, Eddie, I thought you knew about these things!
Magistrates and judges remand people in custody every day of the week for far less serious crimes than the ones you mention. The 1976 Bail Act governs what happens and it says, basically that everybody has the right to bail unless it can be shown that there is genuine reason to believe that they might:
(a) Abscond (i.e. fail to turn up for their next appearance)
(b) Commit further offences
(c) Interfere with the course of justice (in particular, witnesses)
Bail with conditions may be granted to allay those fears (e.g. a condition to stay away from a particular person and/or location if the problem is (c)). But if no conditions satisfy the court that the risk is sufficiently reduced then a remand in custody is appropriate. In particular remands in custody are frequently used for cases of assault committed as Domestic Violence, where it is feared that the accused, if released, may “persuade” the victim to “change her mind”.
There is insufficient detail to say why the court was satisfied that these people should be granted bail. The fact that they may have no UK address (and we don’t know if that is the case) is not, by itself, a reason to refuse bail.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.