ChatterBank0 min ago
Police Investigate Alleged ‘Brutal Lashings’ By Christian Leader
https:/ /www.ch annel4. com/new s/polic e-inves tigate- alleged -brutal -lashin gs-by-c hristia n-leade r
I saw this on CH4 News last night and it was horrific. Its a case of the Media, this time CH4, bringing it to our attention.
CH4 and the BBC get a lot of stick on here but thank God they are prepared to stick their necks out with investigations like this.
The Church of England wee left floundering as usual !
I saw this on CH4 News last night and it was horrific. Its a case of the Media, this time CH4, bringing it to our attention.
CH4 and the BBC get a lot of stick on here but thank God they are prepared to stick their necks out with investigations like this.
The Church of England wee left floundering as usual !
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Here is the response of Smyth's own daughter ::::
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/vi deo_and _audio/ headlin es/3884 7949
http://
The body language is seriously significant in this exchange.
Smyth adopts the look of someone not used to be questioned about anything, ever, and is suitably lofty and dismissive in his answers. But it's his wife's reaction that is the most telling. Does she defend her husband? No, she hangs back with a rictus grin on her face of the sort the buttoned-up British do when they are faced with something unpleasant that they prefer not to think about. Once has has walked away, he holds her hand to give an image of 'unity' which is clearly not real, given her deference to him in terms of dealing with a pesky (woman!) reporter.
The man is clearly a sadistic pervert who gives Christians a bad name.
And he's got a comb-over - the ultimate badge of men who don't accept reality.
Smyth adopts the look of someone not used to be questioned about anything, ever, and is suitably lofty and dismissive in his answers. But it's his wife's reaction that is the most telling. Does she defend her husband? No, she hangs back with a rictus grin on her face of the sort the buttoned-up British do when they are faced with something unpleasant that they prefer not to think about. Once has has walked away, he holds her hand to give an image of 'unity' which is clearly not real, given her deference to him in terms of dealing with a pesky (woman!) reporter.
The man is clearly a sadistic pervert who gives Christians a bad name.
And he's got a comb-over - the ultimate badge of men who don't accept reality.
vortex - ////Can you point to any examples of ' ... the constant hounding of Christians'? //
I can: lots of threads involving Mikey, Andy Hughes etc ;-) //
Obviosuly I can only speak personaly, but if you can find one, just one, example of me 'hounding' anyone of any faith anywhere on this site, I will be very very interested to read it.
Time to put up, or shut up.
I can: lots of threads involving Mikey, Andy Hughes etc ;-) //
Obviosuly I can only speak personaly, but if you can find one, just one, example of me 'hounding' anyone of any faith anywhere on this site, I will be very very interested to read it.
Time to put up, or shut up.
bednobs - //one could say that answerbankers were sick to the back teeth of every thrread in news being overtaken by five or six posters that love to be rude to each other and go on and on and on and on and on seemingly in perpetuity //
One could - but I am willing to let it go when I see it - maybe you should try and do the same, saves detailing threads by making an issue of it.
One could - but I am willing to let it go when I see it - maybe you should try and do the same, saves detailing threads by making an issue of it.
HereIam - and others - from my experience, debates don't really flourish if people point out what the debate is not about, instead of discussing what it is about.
If people want to argue the merits of a view that this programme would not have been made about a Muslim cleric, then that is a different question for a different thread.
There is no point at all in stating that view on here - it is not what the OP raised in the first place.
If people want to argue the merits of a view that this programme would not have been made about a Muslim cleric, then that is a different question for a different thread.
There is no point at all in stating that view on here - it is not what the OP raised in the first place.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.