Starmer Claims First Job Was On A Farm...
News1 min ago
No best answer has yet been selected by dzug. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I'm pretty sure they haven't. some get so tongue tied and have no idea what to say, and they'd all be coming out with super witty oneliners if they had - if i was them i'd spend ages coming up with a great lines.
perhaps they get a quick look 5 mins before, but i doubt they are given any decent length of time to prepare anything.
they also don't know who will get what topic as it changes all the way through
I've been to recordings of "I'm Sorry I Haven't a Clue" (funniest programme on radio) where the contestants also have to come up with quick, funny answers. They seem to produce these almost instantly and a few times dry up or are not so funny (and are edited out). But I still have a SLIGHT suspicion they have seen the questions previously.
I was reading about �I�m sorry I haven�t a clue� on the BBC�s website and Humphrey Lyttleton says that the panellists get a few days notice of some of the rounds. I would guess that the need to provide a funny show is high on any producer�s list of priorities and they can�t run too much of a risk of people drying up and so some sort of advance preparation is also made for JAM. Only my guess, mind, and as it always makes me laugh I hope they continue.
it makes sense to give them a little bit of a headsup like immediately before the show starts - to give them a chance to think of things from their lives etc rather than being 'caught on the hop', but days in advance is too long and i agree on SIHAC sounding contrived sometimes, but i think JAM usually sounds unscripted.
on JAM, the rules of buzzing in could be foiled by people memorizing 'mini scripts' on the subjects, so as not to repeat or deviate - which they do a lot, so i think it can't be much time in advance.