Technology0 min ago
Michael Crichton
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by Dick Daskell. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.He's a graduate from Harvard Medical School and once ran a computer software company. I suppose he writes about the things he knows best.
I enjoyed his website. Hope you do, too.
http://www.crichton-official.com/aboutmc/biography.html
I found much more detail in the book of Jurasic Park than the film and so much more interesting.
The book was a fairly serious study of the dangers of genetic modification (although still a "fun" book).
For example, in the book the triceratops that is ill has got problems because it is an animal from mllions of years ago, but eating plants that are around today.
Many dinasours used to eat stones so that they would help grind up the food in their stomach. In the book the tricaratops has eaten too many stones as it could not digest the modern plants.
This was almost completely glossed over in the film and it was just portrayed as a "cute" animal that was ill.