Fairy Farms Gummies Australia Why Trust...
Body & Soul0 min ago
Carbon 14 Dating
Hi, I've spent 2 hours trying to find the answer to this;how accurate is carbon 14 dating as a method of determining the age of a tree aged at most 150 years at most,any help please boffins would be most appreciated,thanks all !
Answers
1 to 7 of 7
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by notnutnut. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Not very. The calibration date for C14 measurement is taken as C14 levels in 1950, so it's already 63 years out before you've started.
The cost of using C14 to provide this date would be prohibitive unless you are flush with cash.
A piece of wood of that date could be securely dated by its context - where and with what it was found for example - or by its style if carved, or by comparison with tree ring samples (dendrochronology) if big enough to display these.
Why so you need to use absolute dating on the sample?
The cost of using C14 to provide this date would be prohibitive unless you are flush with cash.
A piece of wood of that date could be securely dated by its context - where and with what it was found for example - or by its style if carved, or by comparison with tree ring samples (dendrochronology) if big enough to display these.
Why so you need to use absolute dating on the sample?
You say tree - do you mean a living tree?
If so you can't use radiocarbon dating at all.
The whole system is based on the fact that living organisms take in a mix of radioactive and non radioactive carbon and when they die the proportion or radioactive carbon drops as it decays.
Carbon dating will only give you the age from when something died
(and I do hate the term "boffin!" :c) )
If so you can't use radiocarbon dating at all.
The whole system is based on the fact that living organisms take in a mix of radioactive and non radioactive carbon and when they die the proportion or radioactive carbon drops as it decays.
Carbon dating will only give you the age from when something died
(and I do hate the term "boffin!" :c) )
//(and I do hate the term "boffin!" :c) )//
. . . possibly a bit more acceptable than egghead, nerd, or geek. ;o)
http://
. . . possibly a bit more acceptable than egghead, nerd, or geek. ;o)
http://
It may be possible to extract a core and then count the rings. The heartwood of the tree is effectively devoid of living cells and therefore the ratio of C14 to C12 will decrease exponentially.
The outer layers of the tree are living, therefore the ratio of C14 to C12 will be constant.
If the age of a tree is defined as the age of the (dead) central heartwood then it is hypothetically possible to use C-14 dating. However the percentage uncertainty in the calculated age would be large for such a young sample.
The outer layers of the tree are living, therefore the ratio of C14 to C12 will be constant.
If the age of a tree is defined as the age of the (dead) central heartwood then it is hypothetically possible to use C-14 dating. However the percentage uncertainty in the calculated age would be large for such a young sample.
1 to 7 of 7
