Elliptical orbits? You want Kepler's laws of motion. The radius of the ellipse changes in length but "sweeps out equal areas in equal measures of time".
Based on inverse square law, if you increase distance from sun by 3.4% then you reduce theoretical received sunlight intensity by 1/{1.034^2} which comes to 93.5% (of December intensity, for Northern hemisphere).
I find it an intriguing idea that Southern hemisphere summer might be shorter in duration than in the north* as the earth speeds up in its orbit around the sun but, perhaps, being at its closest approach to the sun in that segment of the orbit makes up any shortfall in heat intake for the hemisphere as a whole?
Or does it? Maybe an assymetrical heating of the planet is responsible for one or more global weather mechanisms?
*Thinking again, surely the gap between equinoxes is still 6 months in the southern hemisphere? Equal areas rule again.
Elsewhere, I found: -
"London is at latitude 52 deg N.
At 21 june, at noon the Sun will be at a maximum angle of 90-52+23.5 = 61.5 degrees.
On 21 December, at noon the Sun will be at a minimum noon angle of 90-52-23.5 = 14.5 degrees."
I can't do justice to the mathematics but we can all shine a torch against a wall and watch what happens to the illuminated area when you tilt the angle of the beam: fixed intensity spread over a larger area = reduced intensity per unit area.
Is the reduction as simple as sin(angle)? I don't know but, for what it's worth, if the noon sun at 90deg=100% intensity then sun at 61.5deg would be 87.8% and sun at 14.5 deg would be 25%.
You'd need a spreadsheet to do it justice but you don't need that to tell you that ~18 hours of daylight in summer means it'll be hot and ~6 hours sunlight in winter mean it will be cold. ...at least theoretically, in the middle of a continental land mass. Britain is a special case, the effects of being surrounded by sea, the Gulf Stream, the wobbly Jet Stream, as we are frequently reminded by the Met Office folk.