News0 min ago
Congrats To The Nobel Prize For Physics Winners......
55 Answers
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/s cience- environ ment-54 420240
It was a long time coming for Sir Roger, physics legend, well deserved.
It was a long time coming for Sir Roger, physics legend, well deserved.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
I did say that. I didn't say it was made up tho. Star trek was the first thing that sprang to mind when PP mentioned them.
I thought, over our Brexit discussions that I'd trained you to spot things which were factual but not necessarily portrayed the whole picture (i.e. subtleties), but it would seem not to be the case.
Ah well.
I thought, over our Brexit discussions that I'd trained you to spot things which were factual but not necessarily portrayed the whole picture (i.e. subtleties), but it would seem not to be the case.
Ah well.
celestial mechanics
is that the one who has in the first edition 1780( theorie de mechanique celestial) a prediction of blach holes
which in the third 1802 he has taken out as thought better of it. The idea being that light by 1800 was clearly not particulate ( newtonian and therefore affected by gravity) but wave form ( which rather obviously wasnt affected by gravity)
Ay am trying to lift this discussion above the level of abuse
is that the one who has in the first edition 1780( theorie de mechanique celestial) a prediction of blach holes
which in the third 1802 he has taken out as thought better of it. The idea being that light by 1800 was clearly not particulate ( newtonian and therefore affected by gravity) but wave form ( which rather obviously wasnt affected by gravity)
Ay am trying to lift this discussion above the level of abuse
-- answer removed --
Maffmen can get a Nobel if they field it as something else....
Penrose here
Geim ( maff Manchester ) got one in chemistry for the new Carbon chemistry - never went near a test tube
and Nash ( beautiful mind) for economics there was even a movement readers that he shouldnt because he was a holocaust denier ( and also a mad as a nine bob note)
and what will the Nobel committee say tomorrow?
Penrose here
Geim ( maff Manchester ) got one in chemistry for the new Carbon chemistry - never went near a test tube
and Nash ( beautiful mind) for economics there was even a movement readers that he shouldnt because he was a holocaust denier ( and also a mad as a nine bob note)
and what will the Nobel committee say tomorrow?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.