I'll be honest with you and say that If someone came up to me with figures of this nature, I'd be very sceptical. Two reasons occur to me immediately and I'll try to explain without going too deeply into statistics.
Firstly, I doubt very much whether any ante-natal clinics, GP's, midwives etc collate this information. Can you recall any medical professional asking either of you how many times you had made love before you conceived? It's a very personal issue that some may find offensive and I can't see these people risking a broken nose or a complaint made against them however well intentioned their research.
I sometimes advise the Biochemistry department's of two of the UK's largest teaching hospitals, both with O and G Departments. I've seen my fair share of medical records compliled by consultants/registrars and SHO's and I've never seen any notes made about first time conceptions.
Without the collection and collation of data, there is no way the odds can be calculated and thus, conclusions drawn.
Secondly, you need to remember that calculating the odds in matters like this are not straightforward. It would be possible to compile a whole host of contradictory statistics. For example, Is the mother a smoker? Is she over 30? Is she over 40? Did she drink alcohol during any of the trimesters? What social class can she be categorised as? What's her ethnic origin?
It's simply not possible to blindly collect information like this from mother's as all the above factors and many others may have influenced the conception. Don't misunderstand - I'm not saying that any of them do influence the chances of conception, but they may do so and that's enough to upset the data conclusions. The possible permutations are immense, which would make the whole exercise futile.